Sunday 29 September 2019

Siri Mendidik Zakir Naik. 2 : Ved Prakash’s Suggestion?



Siri Mendidik Zakir Naik.  2 :
Ved Prakash’s Suggestion?


<script async src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.
com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<script>
     (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({
          google_ad_client: "ca-pub-2960278825814307",
          enable_page_level_ads: true
     });
</script>


Question.
Did Dr. Ved Prakash advises all Hindus to
convert to Islam?


Answer.
No. Dr. Ved Prakash never suggested that because
most probably  this person doesn't exist.. Only
propaganda groups like Zakir and his followers try
to mislead the public, especially Hindus because
of their own agenda. There is not a single word
about the Prophet in any of the Hindu Scriptures
except in the name of the phonetic sound only. But
it refers to other negative elements. All of the words
used by Ved Prakash are merely literal or transliteral
but their original meaning is something else. His
original purpose was to find common ground with the
aim of bringing about religious harmony. No news
about  Ved Prakash, never changed his religion but
if he changes his religion, he would lose the right to
evaluate Hinduism.


Manipulations.
Recently this photo circulated in whatsapp / Fb.




This viraled  photo was used in a seminar program. It seems
to suggest that Hindus convert to Islam by propagandist. But
in reality, this statement has been manipulated by a number
of people for their own agenda.


Who is Dr. Ved Prakash?
The identity of Dr Ved Prakash Upaddhay is very vague. No
data can be authenticated. It is as if this character was
designed for propaganda purposes, was associated with
several other persons with the name Ved Prakash. Dr Ved
Prakash Upaddhay never made a live video to prove his new
theory or his existence. Only he or his immediate family can
prove the validity of his existence.
Dr Ved Prakash Upaddhay or Waid Barkash (Muslim writers
used the name) is said to be  the person came up with the
book on idea of Kalki avatar is the prophet. A Professor at
Allahabad University, specializing in Sanskrit. His father's
name is Ram Sajiwan Sumitradevi and his mother is Pratima
Devi Tripathi. Looking at his name, it doesn't seem to have
any connection at all because his surname is so different.
Whereas her father's name was as if the woman's name
was written on the back. Both of her parents' names have
no explicit reference. He is also listed on Marquis Who's Who
as a 'noteworthy educator', when referenced in the list it was
found that the person’s  real name was Ved Prakash NANDA
of Denver, United States lawyer rather than Ved Prakash
Upaddhay. While Dr Ved Prakash is said to have received
the Nilakantha Daibagna award from the Center for Astrological
Study & Research, 1998. But references indicate that the
award was received by another astrologer by the name of
Ved Prakash, we can refer to it on YouTube. There is a lot
of discrepancies in the profile of so called Dr. Ved Prakash
expressed by the propagandists.


Idoelogy of Ved Prakash.
Ved Prakash  buys the belief of some Ahmadiyah Muslims
in India who believes Kalki avatara, and Imam Mahadi.
Their founder Ahmadiyah Sect, Mirza  Ahmad Ghulam
considered as Kalki avatar.
Did he really openly said ‘all Hindus to convert to Islam’? 
If Ved Prakash openly declared that all Hindu must convert
to Islam, then why he and his family never converted in the
first place? How is he contradicting with his own words?
Can anyone quote the reference page number which
proves from the original book  in Hindi?


Dr. Ved Prakash Never Converted Out. Does not
Represent Hinduism.
He never converted because he never said so.(If he
changed his religion, he would lose the right to
speak about Hinduism.)  He is an Arya Samaj follower
whom only accept God in nirguna form, which are
compromises the Islamic way of thinking. Arya Samaj
does not represent Hinduism. Followers of Arya Samaj
are just a small branch of Jnana Yoga, one of the four
streams (Raja Yoga, Jnana Yoga, Bhakti Yoga and
Karma Yoga) of Hinduism. Dr Ved Prakash's opinion
does not represent the entire Hindu religion. The book
titled 'Kalki Autar Aur Mohamad Sahib ' in 1969,
originally written in Hindi, later translated into Bengali
by Ashit Kumar Bandhopaddhay and later to  English
by Muhammad Alamgir. The original book is not
detectable or does not exist. The book was written
based on the articles of Acharya Maulana Usmani
and Vidyarti Abdul Haq of Ahmadiyah followers who
try to portray Mirza Ghulam Ahmad as the Kalki
Avatar later associated with Prophet.
The book was written with the intention to bring
harmony between Ahmadiyah Muslims and Hindus
in order to live peacefully because some of the
Ahmadiyahs believe Kalki Avatar. Some later
writers then made their own assumptions about
the book and came up with suggestions and try
to infuse  it to the Hindus.


Some of the Ahmadis such Vidyayarti Abdul Haq
wrote about Prophet in Hindu scriptures in 1937.
Beside that, Acharya Maulana Syed Naved Usmani
wrote in 1940. So, Ved Prakash  tried to show
similarity between Kalki avatar and Prophet
based to earlier writers.


Cross Checking.
Some cross checkings on the claims, there is
no real proof to claim. There are more  contractions
and all the claims were speculations and biased
arguments. It were the Muslim propagandists
came up with such notion above  to confuse and
attempt to convert Hindus. Many of Muslim writers
used the book as propaganda tool and came up
with articles and books to support the claim further.

The original book were translated and published 
Moulana Ghulam Nabi Shah Naqshbandi, and editor
Syed Mohd Abdul Qadeer Azm in English.  And s
ome religious manipulators such as Q.S. Khan,
Zakir Naik and many others manipulated the book
to maximum. Most of the quotations of Zakir in his
speech plagiarized from this book.


The assumption, Muhammad have been described
in four ways in vedas and Puranas.That are 
Narashangsa (The praised one), Antim rishi ( The
final sage), Kalki Avatar ( The Sage of last period)
and  Muhamad mentioned by names in Veda.
Therefore, from all four, it is Muhamad who is
pointed out. But when checked in Kalki Purana,
main text about Kalki Avatar, there are many
contradictions including the worst is, if we accept
Kalki is the last prophet of Islam, then all other
avatars should be some earlier Prohphets of Islam.
If so, then how about Varaha Avatar? Do Muslims
will accept Varaha Avatar is also as a former Muslim
Prophet? For your information, Varaha Avatar is
swine/pig form.


Whereas according to the Kalki Purana, Kalki has
2 wives only and the Prophet has many wives.
Kalki's parents lived to an old age while the Prophet
was orphaned. The Avatar had 3 brothers and the
Prophet had no brothers. The Avatar had 4 sons
while the Prophet has no son.
Kalki is Avatara (the descendant) that God will
come to earth to help his people when needs
such as adharma have been preached, while
the Prophet is the messenger of God chosen
among men. In addition, Kalki received the horse
(Devadatta) used throughout his life, gets a sword
and a parrot (Suka) bird from Mahadeva (Shiva),
using it until the last day while the Prophet has no
such gift except the buraq used during Israq Mikraj.
Kalki learned the Vedas and art of fight from
Parasurama while the Prophet received the messenger
through angels. Kalki also has magical powers like
Ashta Siddhis while the Prophet does not.


Conclusion.
There are many differences that can be listed if
studied in depth in Hindu scriptures. Why there
is no single word mentioned in Islamic scriptures
about Kalki since it is last scripture and about 
last prophet?.


There is not one word about Prophet Muhammad
in any of the Hindu scriptures. All of these "arguments"
are mere assumptions. The suggestions in the picture
are  false, lie, slanderous, and blasphemy towards
Hinduism and Hindu scriptures. Hope the responsible
party to stop this terrible act. If the author of the book
exists, then he  should come forward with the original
book showing the recommendation to prove the
truth of his words. Until then it is another propaganda
of conversion agents.


Om Namasivaya.


Sivasiddhi.
Sivasiddhi Spiritual Foundation.
29 September 2019

Bahasa Malaysia Version.


Reference


2.Danial Zainal Abidin,Islam the Misunderstood Religion,

PTS Millennia Sdn Bhd ,2012 pg 93/ 94



3.4 Soalan Yang Membongkar Pembohongan Dan
Kebodohan Zakir 


4. Bhumipati Das, Kalki Purana (Translated).
Jai Nitai Press 2006, India


5.Muslim blogger.


6.Upaddhay, Ved Prakash, Muhammad in Hindu Scriptures
(Translated), (2006) Delhi: Islamic Book Service, India




8.Dr Ved Prakash Phd Astrology


9. Dr Ved Prakash Upaddhay


10. Ved Prakash Nanda.


11.Dilema Muslim


12.Zakir’s modus operandi on religion conversion


13.Kepada Orang Yang Mempertuhankan Zakir


14.An Open Letter to Dr.Zakir Naik: Hindus are Demanding
a Public Apology from Zakir Naik


Sunday 15 September 2019

Mengapakah Zamri Vinoth Kalimuthu Sembah Batu?



Mengapa Zamri Vinoth Kalimuthu Sembah Batu?

<script async src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<script>
     (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({
          google_ad_client: "ca-pub-2960278825814307",
          enable_page_level_ads: true
     });
</script>
Melalui sebuah video yang tular di media massa, saya melihat 
Zamri berceramah. Dalam ceramah agama itu, Saudara Zamri
Vinoth mengaku beliau mati akal untuk berfikir (tak boleh brain)
semasa kecil kerana pada masa itu beliau sembah batu dan
kemudian bagi batu itu makan. Kedangkalan akal fikiran Zamri
menyebabkan beliau sembah batu.

Saya tidak tahu siapa ajar beliau untuk sembah batu tetapi
setiap orang Hindu tahu dengan jelas bahawa mereka sembah
Tuhan dalam bentuk Murthy (berhala / Idol).
Apa yang Zamri nampak ialah patung batu,
memang benar ia patung batu, dan dalam keadaan  malang
itu, Zamri sembah batu. Apa yang dilihat oleh Zamri hanyalah
bentuk fizikal tetapi Zamri gagal melihat secara spiritual (rohani).
Arca (murthy) dan patung berbeza.


Orang Hindu sembah Tuhan dalam bentuk Murthy (Arca). Setiap
seorang Hindu sedar dan faham dengan jelas bahawa Murthy itu
hanya digunakan sebagai medium fokus. Orang Hindu tahu dan
sedar Tuhan juga boleh disembah tanpa imej.


Video 1
Keratan  1
Zamri Vinod  berucap di Kelantan.


Zamri  berkata  bahawa, pada peringkat awal semasa beliau kecil,
beliau (kami) rasa ada yang tak betul dengan agama,  beliau
ingat semua orang bukan Islam  pun rasa begitu. Penganut
agama lain mesti ada rasa tak betul  dengan agama mereka,
'something wrong somewhere'.

Saya percaya Zamri sendiri  ‘something wrong somewhere’,
dia tidak menggunakan akal dengan baik pada ketika dia kecil.
Bapanya seorang  Kristian, manakala ibunya seorang  Hindu,
ini menunjukkan beliau hilang haluan sehingga tidak memahami
agama sendiri.  


Kata Zamri, 2.40 


[1.Zamri: “Pada saya, orang Hindu percaya 330 juta Tuhan,
sembah batu, bagi makan pada batu, 1 hari sembah satu
Tuhan, sampai mati pun tak habis sembah semua tuhan.
Tak logik langsung, Tak boleh brain”]


a.Orang Hindu percaya 330 juta Tuhan?
Orang Hindu yang sebenar faham maksud satu Tuhan dan
banyak Tuhan. Kalau otak (brain) tidak digunakan, memang
tak akan  faham. Konsep Ekan anekan, jelas menyatakan
Brahman dan keadaan Nirguna tiada imej, hanya satu, tiada
anak dll tetapi Tuhan yang Mahaberkuasa , Mahasempurna dll
boleh,mampu dan akan mengambil rupa atau bentuk pada
bila-bila masa tempat, waktu atau keadaan (Srimad Bhagavatam
10.33.36 Tuhan mengambil rupa bentuk manusia  untuk
menunjukkan rasa kasih kepada bhakta.). Iaitu Tuhan dalam
keadaan Sarguna. Apabila Tuhan mengambil rupa , maka kita
boleh lihat rupa itu, boleh ada imej, bentuk, gambar. Boleh juga
ada anak,keluarga dll sekiranya Tuhan mengambil Avatara.
Dalam  Bhagavata Purana 9:24:56, “Apabila berlakunya
keruntuhan dharma dan meningkat kedosaan, Tuhan akan
reinkarnasi dirinya sendiri”. Dalam Bhagavad Geeta, Bab 4,
Ayat 7-8: Apabila berlakunya keruntuhan dharma, O Bharata,
dan meningkat keburukan, maka saya akan manifes diri saya
sendiri. ..., Saya lahir dari  Yuga ke yuga’. Apabila Tuhan
mengambil Avatara, memang Avatara berkenaan itu akan
terikat kepada 'law of Nature' di situ. Zamri tidak tahu maksud
konsep Tuhan dalam agama Hindu. Dia ingat dia tahu maksud
sebenar, tetapi kedangkalan ilmu menyebabkan dia hanya
sembah batu.
Brahm (Brahman)  hanya satu dalam keadaan nirguna (formless), 
Brahman mahakuasa untuk manifest, maka banyak rupa boleh
wujud, manakala  330 juta Tuhan itu salah tafsir orang yang
kurang arif (mantra trayastraiamsat disalah tafsir )


b. Orang Hindu sembah batu?
Zamri sembah Batu, patutlah tak ada otak ( brain). Mana ada
orang Hindu sembah batu? 


Murthy berhala (arca) ialah patung yang telah di tabal  atau
dipasang atau diprogram dengan proses pratista ( installation)
melalui proses mantra dan ritual. Manakala patung yang ada
merata-rata tempat,di kedai tidak di program. Maka ada beza
ketara antara berhala dengan patung. Boleh di analogi sebagai
komputer yang siap dengan programnya dengan komputer yang
belum dipasang dan diprogram. Orang Hindu hanya sembah
Tuhan dalam bentuk berhala dan bukannya patung.


Setiap Orang Hindu tahu bahawa mereka sembah Tuhan
kerana kita menggunakan mantera yang menyebut nama-
nama kebesaran Tuhan sebagai Mahaesa (Mahesan).
Paramjoothy ( Nur agung), Mahasempurna , Sarvaesvara
(Mahamenuhi) , Paramesvara ( Tuhan Mahabesar / Allahuakbar)
dll. Mungkin Zamri sembah dengan kata-kata seperti Oh batu,
berilah aku makanan! atau Oh patung bagilah aku wang atau
Oh pokok lindungilah …. Tiada seorang Hindu pun sembah
sedemikian rupa. Memang jelas Zamri punya otak (brain) tidak
berfungsi dengan waras pada masa itu. Tetapi lebih malang
kerana akal pemikirannya masih di tahap itu kerana video
beliau yang baharu ini mengesahkan beliau masih bertanggapan
begitu..( sembah-patung )


c. Bagi makan kepada batu?
Bagi makan pada batu,  apa punya kesesatan budak Zamri ini. 
Kalau tak tahu, baik buat tak tahu. Ada orang bagi makan
kepada elemen negatif seperti  toyol dan pontianak. Kalau bela
toyol, pontianak, hantu raya baru memang kena bagi makan.
Masyarakat alam ,memang popular dengan pembelaan
toyol dll elemen negatif.

Tetapi di kuil, orang Hindu letak makanan kerana ia mewakili
simbol tanah, selain makanan kita juga letak air, api (deepa),
udara (colok / kemeyan)  dan ruang (bunga / space) iaitu lima
elemen asas kehidupan semua benda di bumi. Ia bukan memberi
makanan kepada unsur / entiti tertentu. Dalam golongan mistik,
ada kumpulan yang salah tafsir atau salah ritual. Memang Zamri
sesat pada masa itu. Manakala golongan yang menjalani amalan
Bhakti, mereka meletakkan makanan sebagai tanda kesyukuran
kepada Tuhan. Dalam Bhagavad Gita ada disebut, " orang yang
tidak meletak makanan di tempat sembahan boleh dikatakan
sebagai 'pencuri' kerana setiap rezeki datang daripada Tuhan"


2. [Tiga agama tak sama]
Saya setuju dengan pernyataan ini. Memang agama Hindu
tidak sama dengan agama aliran Abraham. Agama Hindu
utamakan dharma dan asas utama amat berbeza.



3.Way of life. 
[Agama Islam lengkap dengan segala ajaran, tetapi agama
lain tiada]


Saya tiada masalah mengenai pandangan beliau mengenai
agama Islam.
Orang Hindu melihat Sanatana Dharma dalam pelbagai cara,
antaranya ‘way of life/ cara hidup, agama atau spiritualisme.
Mana-mana pilihan tiada masalah kepada Hindu yang lain.
Selain itu ada 4 marga / path boleh dipilih iaitu Raja Yoga,
Jnana Yoga , Bakthi Yoga atau Karma Yoga. Masing-masing
ada pandangan sendiri tanpa bercanggah dengan marga
yang lain dalam perkara asas.


Cuma untuk pengetahuan beliau, dalam agama Hindu, semua
adab pun telah diajarkan, daripada  bangun sampai ke tidur,
daripada hidup sampai mati, adab jaga di dunia dan alam
fana juga disebut. Kitab-kitab Hindu telah menjelaskan semua
perkara daripada satu atom sampailah kepada alam smesta,
setiap sesuatu telah dijelaskan. Malangnya Zamri  tak baca,
sesat masa kecil pulak. Inilah masalah rasa atau andaian.
Masalah sendiri Zamri ialah tak kenal kebesaran Tuhan dalam
Hindu. Beliau telah bertukar agama kepada yang baharu,
ini bukan masalah orang Hindu kerana segala perbuatan itu
ditanggungnya sendiri. Hutang Karma tetap perlu dibayar.
Pertukaran agama itu dosa besar, perlu di tanggung oleh
diri sendiri. 


Keratan  2.


Zamri mendakwa bahawa,
4.[ Ada orang bukan Islam ingat Kaabah sebagai berhala?...
Tiada seorang Islam yang sembah yang dengan anggapan
sembah Kaabah.]


Kalau ada orang bukan Islam mempunyai tanggapan sebegitu
terhadap Kaabah, orang Hindu tidak patut dikaitkan dengan
pandangan itu. Itu masalah orang yang berpandangan begitu.

Tiada satu orang Hindu pun sembah Tuhan (Murthy) dengan
anggapan bahawa sembah patung. Sebagai mana orang Islam
sembah Tuhan bukannya Kaabah atau Hajar aswad walaupun
sujud di hadapan bangunan Kaabah.


5.[Ada orang pijak Kaabah, adakah orang Hindu memijak berhala?]
Perbandingan yang tidak relevan. Kaabah ialah bangunan, berhala
ialah batu hitam. Sepatutnya kaabah patut dibandingkan dengan Kuil,
mana kala batu hitam hajar aswad patut  dibandingkan dengan batu
hitam berhala.Saya pulangkan soalan beliau itu. Adakah orang pernah
pijak batu Hajar aswad? (Firdaus-wong-  perbandingan bodoh)


6.[Zamri,"Maksud lingam ialah kemaluan. Sivalingam ialah kemaluan
sivalingam".]


Linga bermaksud simbol. Simbol yang mewakili Shiva yang
merangkumi alam smesta. Tiada seorang Hindu yang sembah
Tuhan dalam bentuk Shivalinga dengan tanggapan seperti
yang didakwa oleh Zamri. Pihak seperti golongan jahiliah
( bodoh ilmu ) dan anti Hindu selalu mentafsir sebegitu dengan
tujuan menghina. Contoh terbaik ialah tafsiran orang seperti
Salman Rushdie yang mentafsir ikut kepala sendiri. Maksud
Lingam di tafsir oleh  Monier Williams, dalam  Upanishads dan
Kitab Hindu, ia dirujuk kepada tanda, simbol, perlambangan atau sifat.


Kesimpulan.
Jangan main rasa-rasa, membuat andaian sendiri! Rasa atau
andaian itu boleh menjadi fitnah sekiranya perkara yang  itu
salah. Ia ialah fitnah namanya. Jangan kekal bodoh selamanya.
Masa kecil dahulu, mungkin anda bodoh, tak boleh brain tetapi
sekarang dah matang tetapi otak masih kekal tak boleh brain
ialah keadaan yang sangat malang. Kitab baharu anda ada jelas
menyatakan jangan hina sembahan orang (Quran 6.108). Baik
tumpukan perhatian untuk mendalami agama baharu supaya
dapat peluang untuk mendekati Tuhan.


Sivasiddhi.
Sivasiddhi Spiritual Foundation
2 Ogos 2019


Rujukan.
1.Link asal Zamri hina agama Hindu. Video 1 (keratan 1 dan 2)


2. Second link


3. Zamri Hina Sivalinga


4. Zamri  Rasa tak betul…


5.A lingam (Sanskrit) means  "sign, symbol or mark"


6.Sembah Patung? Agama Apa Itu?


7.33 Crore of Hindu Gods?


8. Shiva Linga Dan Konsep Tuhan


9. Firdaus Wong Wai Hung dan MRM R&D TEAM Membuat
Perbandingan Bodoh Lagi. 
(Kaabah di bandingkan dengan berhala)


10.Wrong Perception on Hinduism by non-Hindus – Tell Them
The Truth