Zakir Naik Please Repent

Zakir Naik Please Repent : Blantant lies,slanders and blasphemy against Hinduism.

He need to repent. He is making terrible blasphemy on Hinduism. He is confused and confusing other people.

Reason 1:  He is associating Allah and His Prophet Muhammad with Hindu Gods.

He is associating his God and the prophet with Hindu God. By trying to proof that Prophet Muhammad is the Kalki Avatar (10th Avatar of Vishnu), he is admitting the truth of Vishnu and the other nine of His avatars. Without accepting the truth of Hinduism he cannot proof his claim. If his claim is true, then he is associating.  Is he  trying to convince Muslims that the Prophet Muhammad is the Kalki Avatar?  Or Allah is the Lord Siva? By trying to confusing Hindus, indirectly he  confused more Muslims. He also got mentioned that he got no objection if pray god in the name Brahma (creator / Khalid )or Vishnu ( sustainer / Rebb).

Reason 2:  Degrading the Holy Quran.

Holy Quran is God’s words. Quran cannot be wrong and the supreme reference for Muslims. But he need Hindu scriptures to proof Prophet Muhammad and the God. He is using a scripture which is not given by Allah to proof His messenger. Is Kalki Purana more accurate to explain about prophet? He further using Bhagavad Gita to explain and accept that is true! He  failed to convey God’s messages based on Holy Quran; The Miracle. As a Muslim it is wise to use Allah’s words to convey the messages.

Reason 3: He is degrading Quran further with his kindergarten formula.

His formula itself is humiliating the Muslims and the Quran. His kindergarten’s formula 2 + 2 = 4. He claims Holy Quran is equal to his kindergarten formula. He also claimed other scriptures from different faith are wrong. It is his right. He claimed, not us. I think Holy Quran doesn’t fit to such a low formula. The Quran’s formula is miracle. Don’t he realised that number 4 is just a symbol that taught to us by our elders. We only knew the symbol 4   means four. Because all of us were taught the same meaning for that symbol so we accept that. If you show that symbol 4 to a child who was never been taught, do you think the child will recognise the meaning. Who knew the actual meaning of that symbol 4? His formula created confusion. He made me to conclude that nobody knew the exact meaning of the Holy Quran.

Reason 4:  He is humiliating Islam by humiliating other faiths. (Q.6.108)

As far as I know, God never permits any Muslims to humiliate, degrade or even do badly against other faith believers. The Prophet had said, ”By hurting non-Muslims, you are hurting me”. Zakir should think what he is doing? He is supposed to convey the God’s messages.  In a proper way unless any other special provision is in the religion. For example, he said the Hindus are praying statues, idols…cockroach etc.  Are the Hindus really praying statue? He thinks it is a stone? Yes he is right on the physical sight.. But if he asked any of the Hindus, they will say no. Hindus knew they are not praying statue, they are praying God. To understand this, one must do as below.

Go to your house, take a look at your parent photo, you will find the truth. Put that photo on the floor and try to step it, you will find the truth. Will you step the paper?  I think no. Why? It is because, you see your parents, not just a paper.

When I go to temple I see statue. Then I see further the God in a particular form.  A women who give birth only, realise the pain and pleasure, not a person who see the women. The person can only understand the pain but cannot realise.  Where you are belongs to, you think. I don’t angry when people like you tell Hindus praying statue because,   I realise you only understand what was taught to you and what you read.  Understand and realise are 2 different things. Even if your scripture is right, it doesn’t mean you got the right to hurt the feeling of the people. You are hurting your Prophet and Islam. Repent.

Reason 5:  Hindus never against God’s Words including The Holy Quran

Hindus believes that everything happens at God’s will alone. Who created the world? Who created humans? Who created you? Who created me? It is absolutely by the almighty God. Hindus never doubt on this truth. I believe God brought Prophet Muhammad to Mecca for His reasons. As we believe that ‘no single atom moves without His consent. This is the reason you must see, why many Hindus never condemn Holy Scriptures. A true religion never condemns another person’s way life, because everything is, His will alone. It is between you and God. When your time, to departure, than only you know the real truth.(Garuda puran. It is sin to insult the scriptures)

Reason 6:  I didn’t choose to be born as a Hindu

I did not choose my religion when I born into this world. As all the faiths, believe God is responsible for everything. As for you it is Allah. I was chosen to be born to the particular parents from the particular faith. I only knew I am a Hindu through my parents. I guess you knew your faith through your parents too. Forgive me if you are a convert. Did you choose your parent when you born? So who choose? I believe the God did the choice. So it is His will alone made me as Hindu. Who has given Islam to the world? Who has given Hinduism and other faiths to the world? Think. You are asking people to listen to you and become Muslim. If I listen to and follow you, it means going against His will. Whoever goes against His will is a sinner. Do you agree? Then as I convert, I go to hell? This is the reason why there is no conversion in Hinduism. Is really God ask you to convert people? Quran says cannot convert for the same reason I think.

Reason 7: You failed to understand Hinduism.

     In Hinduism there are 4 different paths (yoga). The 4 school of thought has different opinion about the form of God. The form and formless form were accepted in Hinduism. You are talking on part of story which is similar to you teaching. A Raja Yogi doesn’t need a form to pray. Don’t forget Islam is a kind of  the path of Jnana Yogi, Which they using scriptures as their guide and partly believe in form of God and some of them don’t as you. Anyway, how Adam was created? He was created from the image of God (Bible), (Quran...refer to Bible) correct me if I am wrong!. Don’t tell me Adam got no form!   

Think. Realize. Repent. You are given Holy Quran by almighty God. You got talent to impressed people, but you stray away from the true path,don’t confuse people. During debate people can argue everything or justify everything. It is only a matter of how to manipulate the words and information. Use your intellectual ability to bring together the Muslims first. Otherwise you are going to create more Sunnis, Shia’s, Salafis and etc.  Just see what is happening in many Muslim countries. Imaging the whole world! If you want to bring peace to the world, please use your ability to peace your Muslim brothers first and this will itself conveys the God’s message to the world. Your Peace TV is not a real peace TV.

Om Namasivaya. 

Sri  Sivasiddhi

Sivasiddhi Spiritual Foundation  Malaysia

13/4/2012

Blasphemy on Krishna. Krishna NOT married 16108 wives.

16100 Krishna's  manifestations married 16100 maidens. 
Not one Krishna had 16100 wives.

<script async src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.

com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<script> (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({
 google_ad_client: "ca-pub-2960278825814307",
 enable_page_level_ads: true});

It is consciousness of the bhaktas. Each individual bhaktas 
can communicate with the God individually. The hidden 
significant of 16100 Krishna married 16100 maides.

Brahman at nirguna state is only one, formless but at

sarguna state can take any form. He took Krishna form

to rescue bhaktas from the ocean of rebirth. 

Basically 2 wives for all deities in Hindu theology represents

our 2 main energies (Ida and Pingala) !!! Krishna's two wives

are Bama and Rukmani. Krishna manifested with 8 wives

representing eight types of wealths (asta laksmi).

In Srimad  Bhagavatam verse 10.59.33 - 35, mentioned

about 16100 maidens prisoned by Bhaumasura, Krishna

rescues them. When they see Him they are enchanted,

accepting Him as husband. They are absorbed by the

heart and contemplation of Krishna as husband in mind.

In Rigveda, verse 10.149.4, mentioned
Love between God and devotee…, like that between

dedicated wife (jaaya) and husband (patim). ( As warriors

to their steeds, kine to their village, as fond milk giving

cows approach their youngling, As man to wife, let Savitar

come downward to us, heaven's bearer, Lord of every

blessing.)

The 2 above quotes clearly show the truth of Hinduism

and its teaching. 

Misconceptions of Zakir on 'Krishna's 16108 wives'.

It shows the stupidity of Zakir.  According Islam, only

one relationship between God (master) and human

(slave).  Zakir slaved his mind frame with his own belief.

But in Hinduism we can choose our relationship with

God in 4 different ways. Father / mother -child,  brothers, 

friends and husband wife relationship.  Most Hindus used

the  Father / Mother - child relationship in praying to God. 

Some even go for  any relationships as they feel it may

make them closer to God. 

In Hinduism, the relationship between God and devotee

can vary. Father / Mother-Child, Siblings (Balarama and

Krishna), Husband-Wife (Gopis in Vrindavan, Mira Bai,

Andal, Radha, Parvati), Friends, Master-Slave etc. For

example the Nalvars (Nayanmars ) Sundaramurthy 

follows Sakamarga (friends), Appar follows  Dasa marga 

(master slave), Sambanthar  follows Satputra marga

(father son) and Manickavasagar follow santmarga,

( love on God)

In Krishna's 16108 wives mentioned in scriptures , 

is the relationship between God as Husband and 

human (bhaktha) as wife. Zakir's poor mind is not able

to see the essence of God's love. Krishna manifested

himself (identical form / prakasa) into 16100 forms

and to marry the 16100 rescued maidens.(Srimad 

Bhagavatam verse 10.59.42) It means 16100 Krishnas

married 16100 maidens. He never had all 16100 of them

in one palace. This shows each of the maidens

individually loved God as husband and saw God of their

own individually without interfering with others bhakti. 

This shows that everyone can individually communicate

with Brahman /God. 

Krishna rescued the maidens from Bhaumasura /

Narakasura with the help of his wife Satyabhama

(believed to be an Avatar of Bhudevi - Narakasura' mother).

Krishna had to marry them so that they could live in dignity

because they were in captivity of an asura. 

The 16100 maidens / gopis also represent all living beings

divided into 16 sections with 1000 sub sections and Krishna

as  the Brahman as supreme soul. 

In Vrindavan gopis love him as a lover. Definitely no physical 

marriage ceremony such as among ordinary humans took 

place. It is an individual's consciousness of the gopis. Another

example is Meera praying Krishna as husband.

Zakir and his gang tries to justify the human marriage with

the divinity. Comparing humans with God is the utmost stupidity

of Zakir. Are this justification is because they are uncomfortable

with the marriage of theirs?

Om Namasivaya. 
Sivasiddhi
Sivasiddhi Spiritual Foundation Malaysia
9 June 2017

References

1.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Junior_wives_of_Krishna

2.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rohini_(Krishna%27s_wife)

3.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashtabharya

4.http://www.srimadbhagavatamclass.com/srimad-bhagavatam-canto-10-chapter-59-text-33/

5.https://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/rigveda/rv10149.htm

6.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Narakasura

7.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bhauma_dynasty

8.https://www.wisdomlib.org/definition/bhauma

Zakir made many muslim become shirk!

Zakir made many muslim become shirk! 

 Based on zakir 's method of manipulations and mistranslate the scriptures... I  can prove the name of Lord Shiva and Vishnu  in many surahs of quran. 
Just one example. In Quran, Allah is all pervading ....it is sarveshwar...one of the Shiva's thousand names.
Even in Quran.
1.  The prophet’s name only mentioned in 4 places than how do you expect his name appeared in other scriptures? It never appeared in any Hindu scriptures
2. Islam prohibits predictions,fortune telling.... and by believing it, it is shirk. The prophet’s name should not predicted earlier by anyone.  If you believe that, then it is SIN.  Poor Zakir made millions of muslims become shirk. Zakir made muslims fool.
3.  There is no single word mentioned about the prophet in any of Hindu scriptures. There is only one nearest sound like name in Bhavishya Puran....
4. By believing Muhammad as Kalki avatar of Lord Vishnu then one MUST believe all the other avatars of Vishnu. If so than Muhammad will be the avatar of God. This is the WORST SIN  according Islam. ASSOCIATING Muhammad WITH ALLAH ....ASSOCIATING VISHNU WITH ALLAH.   According Quran HELL is waiting for those who associates Allah.

Om Namasivaya. 
Sri  Sivasiddhi
Sivasiddhi Spiritual Foundation  Malaysia

Kepada Orang Yang Mempertuhankan Zakir

<script async src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script> <script> (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({ google_ad_client: "ca-pub-2960278825814307", enable_page_level_ads: true }); </script>

 Kepada Orang Yang Mempertuhankan Zakir.

 Wahai orang Muslim yang mempercayai kata -kata Zakir sebagai benar dan tidak menghina agama lain atau tidak bercanggah dengan agama Islam, maka kamu juga menerima metodologi/pendekatan Zakir memetik ayat -ayat daripada Kitab Hindu, kemudian membuat andaian dan tafsiran sendiri berdasarkan pemahaman sendiri. Seterusnya membuat kesimpulan yang memihak kepada agama Islam dengan menuduh penganut Hindu sebagai telah terpesong daripada ajaran sebenar.

Jika pendekatan Zakir dikira ilmiah apabila  saya mengunakan kaedah Zakir  dan membuat tafsiran sendiri yang juga patut dikira ilmiah.  Saya dapat menyimpulkan perkara- perkara berbangkit daripada kaedah Zakir yang perlu direnung oleh masyarakat Islam.

Zakir percaya dan yakin bahawa nama Nabi terakhir telah diramalkan dalam kitab-kitab Hindu. Ini secara langsung Zakir mempercayai dan mengesahkan kesahihan Kitab kitab Hindu telah diturunkan oleh Tuhan yang satu.

1.Masyarakat Islam yang berpegang teguh kepada Rukun Iman, iaitu beriman kepada al Quran dan Hadis sahaja. Tetapi kini masyarakat telah menerima Veda dll kitab, banyak yang menggunakan ayat- ayat daripada Veda. Bukankah mempercayai kitab kitab lain daripada ajaran Islam boleh menyimpangkan akidah orang muslim?

2. Amalan meramal masa depan adalah suatu perbuatan yang dikira syirik dalam Islam. Lebih lebih lagi mempercayai ramalan daripada kitab Hindu.  Jika ramalan adalah syirik, maka mempercayai ramalan juga syirik. Dengan mempercayai ramalan Zakir mengenai nama Nabi, bukankah perkara ini telah menyebabkan semua orang yang mempercayai Zakir juga turut berdosa kerana mempercayai ramalan?

3. Zakir amat yakin bahawa Nabi terakhir adalah orang yang sama yang disebut dalam kitab Hindu, dipercayai  Kalki avatar ( reinkarnasi Tuhan Vishnu) . Andaikan perkara ini benar ( pembohongan semata-mata,tiada sepatah perkataan yang menyebut nama Nabi), jika masyarakat Islam setuju dengan Zakir dan menerima Nabi adalah Kalki , maka wahai orang Muslim renunglah lebih mendalam.

Kalki avatar dipercayai adalah yang terakhir, tetapi ada kesemua 24 avatar yang berbeza sebelum ini. Jika pandangan Zakir dikira ilmiah, maka orang yang mempercayai Zakir harus juga mempercayai kesemua avatar Tuhan Vishnu yang lebih awal sebagai Nabi - Nabi Islam yang lebih awal. Jika ianya dikira ilmiah,maka orang yang mempercayai Zakir tiada pilihan lain melainkan menerimanya. Oleh hal yang demikian, orang Islam juga harus membuka minda lebih dalam  sedikit.

Dikalangan 24 avatar yang diambil oleh Vishnu, ada diantaranya bukan manusia ,contohnya Kurma ( penyu), Matsya(ikan) dan Varaha(babi). Persoalannya, adakah masyarakat Islam yang percaya Zakir menerima bahawa Nabi - Nabi Islam  itu mungkin juga terdiri daripada kalangan haiwan, lebih - lebih lagi babi? (Varaha avatar- Ada orang Hindu tidak makan babi kerana Tuhan Vishnu mengambil reinkarnasi ini.) Babi dikira haram dalam agama Islam. Adakah seorang Nabi Islam yang awal telah dilahirkan sebagai babi? Adakah pendekatan Zakir boleh diterima pakai orang Islam sendiri?

Siapakah yang telah terpesong? Tepuk dada tanya selera! Tafsiran Zakir mengenai kitab Hindu tidak jauh beza dengan Salman Rushdie. Kedua-duanya tafsir ikut kepala sendiri. Tafsiran yang salah, bohong,fitnah dan nista.

Om Namasivaya.

Sri  Sivasiddhi
Sivasiddhi Spiritual Foundation  Malaysia
31 May 2017

Rujukan
1. Kalki Purana.

Zakir’s modus operandi on religion conversion

Zakir’s modus operandi on religion conversion is simple.

His propaganda is ‘come into the common term’. He calls everyone look into what is common in religions and follow it.( His famous talk is about Similarity between Islam and Hinduism). He tries to prove Islam and Hinduism is same.

The problem is ,his analogy of common term is based to his own religion, Islam.  Whatever ideologies which are compromises Islam assumed/deemed as common term,neglecting all other religions fundamentals.Basic fundamental Islamic teaching is used as threshold. (This is against the ethics of Comparative Religions).

Basic teaching of Islam.

1. Islam believes one God which has no image,no children,no parents,etc. So Zakir picked whichever verses from Hindu Scriptures suites his belief. Among that the most widely used by Zakir is Yajur Veda 32.3 natasya pratima asti. (Chan.Up 6:2:1, Shv Up 6:9,Shv Up 4:19,Shv Up 4:20,...and many more) The idea of God has no image is not a contradiction to our religion because Brahman is also in formless form,etc. No issue here.
2. Islam prohibits idol worship. So Zakir picked the verses from Hindu Scriptures  which he THINKS that  prohibits idol worship. He widely used verse ( i ) Yajur Veda 40.9 in distorted version. Misconception of Zakir,he says Sambhuti as created things ( picture,idol,etc)and Asambhuti as  natural things (air,water,fire etc.) He hides the real meaning and other related verses ( YV 40.10-11).  Most controversial part which he tries to put Hinduism at wrong.  But YV 40.11 is clear evidence of Zakir’s ‘pseudo science’ bigotry attitude.YV40.9 actually says those who ONLY believes  God in formless form is in darkness and those ONLY believes God in form is in the further darkness. YV 40.11 says one who believes  BOTH ,God in form and formless is the real bhakta,will reach his abode.  ( ii ) BG. 7.20 - ‘those intelligence has been stolen by material desire desires surrender unto demigods’, again it is a misconception of Zakir with bad faith. The actual meaning is not related to prohibiting idol worship. There is nowhere written about prohibition of idol worship. Can Zakir ,which exact verse in any of Hindu Scriptures prohibits idol/murthy worship? We can see clearly the lies and slander of Zakir.
3. Prophet Muhammad is the final messenger of God. So Zakir try to prove that Prophet is the final messenger for all and claims that the name of Prophet had been predicted/mentioned in Hindu Scriptures. Example, (i) Zakir claims Kalki Avatar is the Prophet Muhammad based to Kalki Purana. (ii) A few selective words (either translated into Arabic in his own correct manipulated meaning or based to language phonetic) such as Narashangsa, Kaurama, Rebb,Ahamathi etc.from Vedas he picked to prove his claim that they are referring to  Prophet. ( iii) Changed the Bhavisya Purana story to suite his propaganda to prove his claim about Prophet. Bhavisya puran mentions about demoniac ghost of tripurasura (reincarnated) named Mahamada whom will bring adharmic  religion during kaliyuga.
4. Mecca is the  Kiblat (centre point) for Islam. So Zakir try to prove that it is mentioned in Hindu Scriptures in Kuntap Sukta,Atharvaveda
5. Islam believes in one life, no rebirth. So Zakir tries to prove that there is nothing written about rebirth or samsara in any Hindu Scriptures. There MANY verses in Hindu Scriptures.
6. Islam believes in one true God. So Zakir claims that other religions believes  False God. Example (i) Zakir questioned on Chaturti day of  Ganesha, to prove if Ganesha is a true God,if proved he will eat prasad of Ganesha temple. (ii) Zakir questioned how come Shiva cannot recognised His own son Ganesha, Zakir claimed Krishna married 16108  wives,etc. all were blasphemy against Hindu Gods.

7. etc.

Zakir used the above hypothesis and claims that Hindus were wronged by our pandits on Hindu Scriptures. The real teaching of Hinduism is in accordance with Islam as per Hindu Scriptures. He  is advising Hindus to convert to Islam.  Actually Zakir  manipulated,misquoted,mistranslated with his own understandings and imaginations  to confuse the Hindus,so that he can convert them into Islam. All the quotes and references were either  (i) quoted part of true verses or (ii)  taken out of context or  (iii) changed the words to suite his propaganda or (iv) mistranslated with his own correct words/meanings.

Lies and blasphemy of Zakir on Hinduism
Lie no.1. Zakir says "Vedas prohibits idol worship."  There is no word of prohibition. Ask Zakir to prove which exact verse says that? Which verses says God cannot /will not take form?.THERE IS NON
Lie no.2.  Zakir claims " rebirth never mentioned in Vedas." THERE ARE MANY verses from Hindu scriptures.
Lie no.3. Zakir claims his" Prophet's name was predicted in Hindu scripture" . This is another blatant lie.THERE IS NO SINGLE WORD mentioned in any scriptures ...by believing his theory of prediction he became syirik and made all the muslims who believe that also syirik!
Lie no.4.  Zakir claims his Prophet is the Kalki Avatar of Vishnu.This blasphemy against Vishnu the God. KALKI is avatar. Another total lie of Zakir.If his claim is true than he is accepting the other avatars of Vishnu and prophet as avatar or God. This is associating prophet/Kalki with God/Allah. The graves sin in Islam
Lie no.5  Zakir changed the entire story of Bhavisya purana . He made the Mahamada(demoniac ghost) as the saviour of mankind.
Lie no.6  Zakir said Krishna had 16108 wives. It is blasphemy against Krishna.

Lie no. 7  Zakir had insulted Hindu God Ganesha during celebrations and Shiva.

Zakir is liar,slanderer and blasphemer against Hinduism and God. So that Hindus demand a public apology from Zakir.

Om Namasivaya. 
Sri  Sivasiddhi

Sivasiddhi Spiritual Foundation  Malaysia