Kafirism, Infidels and Anarya

Kafirism, Infidels, and Anarya

Labeling people based on their own religious beliefs should be avoided. But some so-called religion labeled people rampantly. Blind bigotry egoistic and ignorant's belief.

Among Abrahamic.
The conception of non Abrahamic by the Abrahamic followers as nonbelievers based on their scriptures and understanding is the most inappropriate thing. Anyway, it is their perceptions.

Kafir (Arabic term) means a person who is denying the existence of God. As in Hinduism, they were called nastika, in Christianity, they were called atheist, and so on. All the religion's fundamental core belief is based on God. Since there is only ONE GOD, non-Muslims are not kafir.  Some fanatic bigots mistranslated their scripture to manipulate their political status-quo by claiming that only if called the God in certain particular name and prayer method is the true God.

Any Muslims can verify from your scripture about the term. It is its own interpretation based to own scripture. It is ok if kept the term within, not say it out. If one labels another based own beliefs, then the others will do the same.
If you address me a kafir, then I will address you as Anarya / Mlecha as mentioned in my scriptures. It is not good for a multiracial society.

God-Centered Belief
All the religions' core belief is God. There is no one prays in the name of Satan.

Hindus say there is God, that is Brahman...
Christians say there is God, that is God...
Muslims say the is NO God, but Allah.
An Atheist says there is NO God...
SO WHO  ARE THE REAL BELIEVER? All are believing something.

Some information about kafir.... extract from Mujahidin Zulkifli
In a typical Islamic country under Islamic administration, the non-Muslims are divided into a few categories:

1) Kafir harbi fi'lan: These are non-Muslims that are physically hostile (waging war) against Islamic countries.

It's a requirement for Muslims to kill them (as announced by Pahang Mufti recently). Killing kafir harbi fi'lan will not result in any punishment for the Muslim killer.

2) Kafir harbi hukman: These are non-Muslims that do not have any privilege of protection in an Islamic country and they are not waging war against an Islamic country.

Killing kafir harbi hukman doesn't bring death punishment to a Muslim but only half of a diyya (compensation to the family). This was backed by a Hadith, where Abu Juhaifa reported: "The Prophet, peace, and blessings be upon him, judged that a believer should not be killed for killing a disbeliever." Sahih Bukhari 6517 in the context of kafir harbi hukman.

3) Kafir muahid and dzimmi: They are non-Muslims who have a protection agreement with an Islamic administration. Muahids are not citizens of the Islamic country but have peace agreements. Dzimmis are citizens and pay jizyahs (a form of tax or protection money).

It is haram to kill these types of non-Muslims. Many Hadiths protecting them. Also backed by Quran 9:29 "Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued."

Among Hindus
The word anarya or mleccha is equivalent to kafir or infidel. We Hindus don't label anyone base on our own beliefs. While parya is a fall out from arya/Hindu

The Real Meaning of Parya * (Modern era)
1. A person who eats beef knowingly,  because eating beef is prohibited and is against the

Hindu tenets.
2. A Hindu converted out from Hinduism because of rejection on Hinduism ( not believing Brahman / God, Hindu scriptures, Rituals, etc.)
3. A person born Hindu but never practiced Hinduism because never believe the Supreme Brahman.
4. Those of descendants of a converted out from Hinduism

Anyone can fall into the category of parya if violated any of the above conditions.

If you are a Hindu, then you cannot be a pariah.  If you're a pariah then you cannot be a Hindu.
The word pariah derived from parya. The word parya is partly synonym to anarya. Anarya means non-Hindu. Arya means Hindu. It doesn't referring the 'parai' drum player community in Tamil Nadu, India. They were Hindus but doing the work of funeral/ cremation

As per Siva Purana, the cow is a divine animal.  Sivaperuman's favorite animal.  His favorite pasu/cow named Susila kept Brindavanam under the care of Govardhan. Thus, eating beef will bring wrath. Fall into category of parya.
Hindus as spiritualists (anmigavathy) no one will accept the term to differentiate the human race. (Vasudewa kurumbakam)
But as a religion perceptor (mathavathy),  this term has its meaning and it will ride away from the other religion's atrocity on Hindus.

We were labeled by non-Hindus as such kaffirs or infidels without understanding the consequences on us.  It is time to teach back.
My thousand apologies if it hurts someone.
If others label us as kafirs or infidels then I feel the term parya will put everyone into a common term. Now, it is time to throwing back the misconception where it belongs. Hindus don't judge people as everyone are the children of Brahman. But, we were forced to come into the common terms of Kafir by Islam and Infidel by Christianity.

Om Namasivaya.

Sivasiddhi
Sivasiddhi Spiritual Foundation  Malaysia

Updated 4 March 2019

Reference
1.https://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2019/03/01/nu-calls-for-end-to-word-infidels-to-describe-non-muslims.html

2.https://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/bahasa/2019/03/06/mufti-perak-pahang-anggap-tak-salah-rujuk-bukan-islam-sebagai-kafir/

Zakir and Terrorism

Zakir and Terrorism

Zakir admits he said 'every muslims should be terrorise the evil doers/anti socials. 

Zakir,
" Every Muslim should become terrorist....  I am for Osama if he terrorizing America the bigger terrorist... "
Some blacksheep of Islam will follow Zakir's word without understand his actual intention. So still Zakir hold the resposibility for his words.
 This is the concrete proof of Zakir as promoter.Why not he say every human should ....? Whom he referring to as evil doers/anti socials? Did Zakir really understand the meaning 'terror'.? Is a policeman is a terrorist ?Terrorism means creating fear by brutality of killing,raping,torturing etc.Cowardly act suicide bomber kills innocents.
What the Isis is doing ?The brutality on non muslims,yazidis etc. Are these people killed by Isis because they are evil doers/anti socials? Worship God in a form of Idol is evil doing/anti social? If so ,Zakir targeting whom to be killed.?
A terrorist last time not a terrorist now,similarly muslim are terrorising now, later will be heroes?
Terrorising the bigger terrorizer?Osama terrorising America.
Many terrorist of non muslims never yell God's name. But these present terrorist YELLING the name of Allah. Why? If the God of these terrorists are praying," ASK THEM TO KILL OTHER HUMAN FOR NOT BELIEVING HIM" If so ,it cannot be God. Only SATAN  will be happy to see human killing each other as in quran (Q.15.39) ,satan had challenged God that he will misled human!.So are the blacksheeps of Islam.
If Zakir realise there is blacksheeps in Islam, than what action did he have taken to eliminate that islamic black sheep as a so called true muslim? Or he is one? 
I personally believe every Muslims hold responsibility on the misconceptions on Quran by the blacksheeps of Islam/terrorist  to take actions on them so they dont further tarnish the image of Islam.The so called true Muslims,what is your action to prevent them/terrorist?

Om Namasivaya. 
Sri  Sivasiddhi


Sivasiddhi Spiritual Foundation  Malaysia

Lies of Zakir on Hinduism.

 Lies of Zakir on Hinduism.

     If I describe  Zakir. He is a liar,slanderer and blasphemer against Hinduism.
I have been follow up him since 2012 and checked his videos and speeches. In the beginning, I was very impressed and admire his ability, but after some cross checking of his quotes I was shock to found out that its were lies and slanders. Most of the his quotes of scriptures are not true. He is using his 'own correct' translations,interpretation,manipulations and imaginations of scriptures to fullfil his propaganda to convert people.
For example. He claims that Vedas prohibited idol (murthy) worships. So the Hindus are wrong. He quotes from Yajur Veda. He quotes only the part which is compromised to his religion. He  never quotes full sentences. This make people confuse. I cross checked most of his quotes.All his claims against Hinduism is false (half baked).Dear Hindus, believe me, there no  truth in his quotes.
His title  "Similarity between Hinduism and ..." .All the similar things were from Hinduism either taken or borrowed by them.In reality Hinduism is Mother of all the religion on earth.

     If one read Bhavisya Purana. Will under stand the nature of  adharmic religions during the kali age and what is the role of Kalki Avatar.
     
      Hindus are following the Vedas,no doubts about that. That word juggler is trying to confuse people.Let me give an example of that Zakir mislead people. He claimed Veda prohibits  idol worships. He quotes Yajur Veda." Those who worship God in the form of image are in  darkness" based on this, he claims it is sin to worship God in the form of idol/image. BUT the mantra is taken out of context. His famous quotes from Yajur Veda 32 and  40. Based on these 2 mantras , he claims God got no image (formless) so no image, no picture, no family and etc.
But in reality the 2 mantras has more .He only takes the words/verses which are suites his propaganda to confuse and convert.
Mantra Yajur Veda 40.The actual mantras mentioned that:
1. God has no image( formless/arupam) and has image (form/rupam).
2. Those who is believe God in ONLY no image form ( formless form) is in the darkness ,those who       believes ONLY in image form is in the further darkness.
3. ONLY those believes both form and formless form of God is the real bhakta,will reach His abode.
 Based on the 2 mantras. Hindus believe God has no image (formless) but can take any image at will at any place. The taken form can have  image ,picture ,family and etc.God is omnipresent,omnipotent and omniscient. Since God can take any form , why not the God take the form of the idol we worship in temple? So any form a bhakta wishes will do. 
In their believe God has no image, if the so called God cannot take any form, than what is the point to pray it as God?
There is no single verse prohibits idol worships in any of 4 Vedas.

      Another blatant lie of Zakir. He claims that their prophet's name appeared in many of  Hindu scriptures.Dear Hindus, believe me. There is no one single word/verse mentioned the name. The only nearest sound like name is Mahamada (demoniac ghost) in Bhavisya Purana. According the purana , kali purusha (satan) get a boon from Vishnu to increase its (satan's) descendant to fullfill the kali yugas ending. Mahamada ,the demoniac ghost which were supposed to teach the adharmic religion (pisachas dharma) where people will divert their belief of God,reject dharma.etc If this Mahamada is the prophet as claimed by the juggler than one must reconsider on 'what is the fundamental teaching of the religion is '.
 He claims the name of the prophet appeared in vedas and other scriptures. What he did ? He did his own interpretations and imaginations of certain word/s from Hindu scriptures and than he  related it to his prophet. Example, the word 'narashangsa'  meaning is the praise worthy, he claim his prophet's another name is praise worthy,so where ever the narashangsa word appears in the Hindu scriptures,he claim it is the prophets name.
There are many examples of lies,slanders and blasphemy of Zakir ,on Vedas and other scriptures.I can list all his misleading quotes and correct that based on Hindu scriptures.

Om Namasivaya. 
Sri  Sivasiddhi

Sivasiddhi Spiritual Foundation  Malaysia

Why Hindus cannot convert into other religion?

According Hinduism, Conversion is SIN.

Reason : Why Hindus cannot convert into other religion?

1.     We (Everybody) are the chosen one. Children of God.

It is God's choice and plan. Every single second is determined by the Almighty God. God made the choice when we were born. God chose us to be born in a particular family to the particular parents of the particular faith.  Since God made the choice, we have no rights to change it because it is God’s WILL. Whoever goes against God’s will is a sinner. That is the reason why there is no Hindu scriptures ever mentioned about conversion. Further, it mentioned we are the children of God.

2.      Hinduism believes in rebirth and karma.

Among 84000 lives, 7 lives are believed to be present as human beings. During the different birth, one can be born in to any religion as the God’s choice. God chose us to be born into a particular faith to fulfil the supposed duty given in that birth. If one changes religion, this means he/she is running away from the given obligations. Need to be reborn again to settle that duty.

3.       Reading Bhavisya Purana will clarify that, Kali purusha (satan), after long penance had received a boon from Lord Vishnu to increase its followers.  Vishnu created Adama and Havyavati to fulfill the boon. Though Vishnu had warned them about Kali purusha’s intention. But Kali purusha (God of Mlecha) deceived them. Since then the children of Adama and Havyawati increased. This was continued up to the demonic ghost Mahamada destinated to appear in the desert. Mahamada (Dharmadusikha/polluter/mlecha) will bring the adharmic religion (pissacha dharma) to fulfil the ending of Kaliyuga. Conversion is allowed in to the adharmic religion in order to help the kali purusha to increase its followers fast and to control kali yuga. But Vishnu had His own plans to precede the Kali purusha to an end later by the Kalki Avatar.

4.  Hindu Shastras have mentioned  conversions is sin.

a) Vyasa says in Mahabharata Santi Parva,
'..The rejection of one's own creed, the practice of other people's creed, .....is wrong .’

b) Bhagavad gita there is a verse, which conveys that Devotee should attain salvation in  a path which he is born ( as taught by parents) and not change paths. Those who change path will neither be happy nor get salvation.  ( Not applicable to tender young children)

c) Vedas ,it has been told to teach everyone in Arya Dharma/Sanatan Dharma/dharmic law. It is a way of life. Distracting from the way of life will be disobeying Vedas.

5. Our sages had opposed conversions.

Adi Shankara had fought against conversion.  He debated with Buddhist monks to revert them back to Hinduism. Adi Shankara,  is one of the important enlightened soul saved Hinduism  from  Buddhism ,many of Hindus were converted during the time. In order to save Hinduism , he debated with them, the loser had to follow the winner's teaching orders.  I don't see this as conversion , it is a move to revert back to Hinduism.   If it was a conversion, then it must be some kind of forced conversion. The question of why Adi Shankara went in to such an approach,  The reason is to save Hinduism from extinction. I am sure, Enlighten soul such as Adi Shankara  realized that divine love is beyond religion but he stand up to revert back them.  At current situation, are we going to  let go the conversion without any  interference?,  Did we realized ,if we never take a firm action, it will lead to our Hindu religion into extinction ? Even Sri Chaitanya Mahaprabu,Tirumular and many other sages have against conversion out. 




   Converts must answer God these questions during judgement day. God will ask.

a) Can you change your parents which 'I' CHOSE for you? It is my WILL.
b) Why you changed the PATH  I chose for? Don't you realize that every second is determined by ME.   Every religion/faith is from Me alone as I am the great planner.
c) Don't you realize, You had violated My PLAN?

For your information, judgement day according Hinduism will take place during death. When the soul leaves body, the soul will undergo trial immediately. Not as in other religion.

Many people had converted. Reasons for conversions were basically not of the realisation on the religion. It is because either lust ( fall in love, get caught wet…),desire ( post, title, power..),anger ( angry on some body ..),ignorance ( no knowledge about birth  religion),survival  (hunger, poverty, sickness..) and by forced ( war, to be killed..) etc. 

If you are a convert, please revert back to your religion of birth! 

Om Namasivaya.

Sri  Sivasiddhi
Sivasiddhi Spiritual Foundation  Malaysia
9 January 2016