Thursday 1 June 2017

Zakir’s modus operandi on religion conversion

Zakir’s modus operandi on religion conversion is simple.
His propaganda is ‘come into the common term’. He calls everyone look into what is common in religions and follow it.( His famous talk is about Similarity between Islam and Hinduism). He tries to prove Islam and Hinduism is same.
The problem is ,his analogy of common term is based to his own religion, Islam.  Whatever ideologies which are compromises Islam assumed/deemed as common term,neglecting all other religions fundamentals.Basic fundamental Islamic teaching is used as threshold. (This is against the ethics of Comparative Religions).

Basic teaching of Islam.
  1. Islam believes one God which has no image,no children,no parents,etc. So Zakir picked whichever verses from Hindu Scriptures suites his belief. Among that the most widely used by Zakir is Yajur Veda 32.3 natasya pratima asti. (Chan.Up 6:2:1, Shv Up 6:9,Shv Up 4:19,Shv Up 4:20,...and many more) The idea of God has no image is not a contradiction to our religion because Brahman is also in formless form,etc. No issue here.
  2. Islam prohibits idol worship. So Zakir picked the verses from Hindu Scriptures  which he THINKS that  prohibits idol worship. He widely used verse ( i ) Yajur Veda 40.9 in distorted version. Misconception of Zakir,he says Sambhuti as created things ( picture,idol,etc)and Asambhuti as  natural things (air,water,fire etc.) He hides the real meaning and other related verses ( YV 40.10-11).  Most controversial part which he tries to put Hinduism at wrong.  But YV 40.11 is clear evidence of Zakir’s ‘pseudo science’ bigotry attitude.YV40.9 actually says those who ONLY believes  God in formless form is in darkness and those ONLY believes God in form is in the further darkness. YV 40.11 says one who believes  BOTH ,God in form and formless is the real bhakta,will reach his abode.  ( ii ) BG. 7.20 - ‘those intelligence has been stolen by material desire desires surrender unto demigods’, again it is a misconception of Zakir with bad faith. The actual meaning is not related to prohibiting idol worship. There is nowhere written about prohibition of idol worship. Can Zakir ,which exact verse in any of Hindu Scriptures prohibits idol/murthy worship? We can see clearly the lies and slander of Zakir.
  3. Prophet Muhammad is the final messenger of God. So Zakir try to prove that Prophet is the final messenger for all and claims that the name of Prophet had been predicted/mentioned in Hindu Scriptures. Example, (i) Zakir claims Kalki Avatar is the Prophet Muhammad based to Kalki Purana. (ii) A few selective words (either translated into Arabic in his own correct manipulated meaning or based to language phonetic) such as Narashangsa, Kaurama, Rebb,Ahamathi etc.from Vedas he picked to prove his claim that they are referring to  Prophet. ( iii) Changed the Bhavisya Purana story to suite his propaganda to prove his claim about Prophet. Bhavisya puran mentions about demoniac ghost of tripurasura (reincarnated) named Mahamada whom will bring adharmic  religion during kaliyuga.
  4. Mecca is the  Kiblat (centre point) for Islam. So Zakir try to prove that it is mentioned in Hindu Scriptures in Kuntap Sukta,Atharvaveda
  5. Islam believes in one life, no rebirth. So Zakir tries to prove that there is nothing written about rebirth or samsara in any Hindu Scriptures. There MANY verses in Hindu Scriptures.
  6. Islam believes in one true God. So Zakir claims that other religions believes  False God. Example (i) Zakir questioned on Chaturti day of  Ganesha, to prove if Ganesha is a true God,if proved he will eat prasad of Ganesha temple. (ii) Zakir questioned how come Shiva cannot recognised His own son Ganesha, Zakir claimed Krishna married 16108  wives,etc. all were blasphemy against Hindu Gods.

  1. etc.

Zakir used the above hypothesis and claims that Hindus were wronged by our pandits on Hindu Scriptures. The real teaching of Hinduism is in accordance with Islam as per Hindu Scriptures. He  is advising Hindus to convert to Islam.  Actually Zakir  manipulated,misquoted,mistranslated with his own understandings and imaginations  to confuse the Hindus,so that he can convert them into Islam. All the quotes and references were either  (i) quoted part of true verses or (ii)  taken out of context or  (iii) changed the words to suite his propaganda or (iv) mistranslated with his own correct words/meanings.

Lies and blasphemy of Zakir on Hinduism
Lie no.1. Zakir says "Vedas prohibits idol worship."  There is no word of prohibition. Ask Zakir to prove which exact verse says that? Which verses says God cannot /will not take form?.THERE IS NON
Lie no.2.  Zakir claims " rebirth never mentioned in Vedas." THERE ARE MANY verses from Hindu scriptures.
Lie no.3. Zakir claims his" Prophet's name was predicted in Hindu scripture" . This is another blatant lie.THERE IS NO SINGLE WORD mentioned in any scriptures ...by believing his theory of prediction he became syirik and made all the muslims who believe that also syirik!
Lie no.4.  Zakir claims his Prophet is the Kalki Avatar of Vishnu.This blasphemy against Vishnu the God. KALKI is avatar. Another total lie of Zakir.If his claim is true than he is accepting the other avatars of Vishnu and prophet as avatar or God. This is associating prophet/Kalki with God/Allah. The graves sin in Islam
Lie no.5  Zakir changed the entire story of Bhavisya purana . He made the Mahamada(demoniac ghost) as the saviour of mankind.
Lie no.6  Zakir said Krishna had 16108 wives. It is blasphemy against Krishna.
Lie no. 7  Zakir had insulted Hindu God Ganesha during celebrations and Shiva.

Zakir is liar,slanderer and blasphemer against Hinduism and God. So that Hindus demand a public apology from Zakir.

Om Namasivaya. 
Sri  Sivasiddhi

Sivasiddhi Spiritual Foundation  Malaysia

3 comments:

  1. Krishna do have 16108 wife. Refer to Srimad Bhagavatam. On Lord Ganesha, Lord Shiva did recognised Ganesha but it is due to kalah, that lila must happen to advise mankind danger of fatherless child to world.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    2. Yes it is mentioned but not in terms of Zakir's prejudiced mind.

      Delete