Aaseevagam: Atheistic Folly Cult. Part 3

Aaseevagam: Atheistic Folly Cult.

A Ploy to Deceive and Destroy Hinduism.

STOP THE FOLLY CULT.

<script async src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.
com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<script> (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({
 google_ad_client: "ca-pub-2960278825814307",
 enable_page_level_ads: true});

Part 3

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=1870884563220745&id=1637620529880484

A Brief Explanation About Aaseevaham Cult.

Introduction.

Aaseevaham or Ajivikam is an atheistic belief. They reject God ( Paramatma or Brahman).Aaseevaham is Ajivikam. Ajivikam is nastikam. Nastikam is atheist. Atheist is anti God. Thus anti Shaivam. So it is anti Murugan and Shivan. Aaseevagam is anti Hinduism. 

Aaseevagars rejected all the Hindu influenced period from First Tamil Sangam up to Bhakti Movement in Tamil Nadu. Thus, Aaseevaham rejects Shaivism. 

Idea or Origin of Aaseevaham.

Some atheists group in Tamil Nadu reintroduce Ajivikam ( the dead cult) in the name of Aaseevaham. The name difference is because of the removal of Sanskrit’s elements from Tamil language. The letter ‘Ji’ is Sanskrit loaned letter replaced with Tamil letter ‘See’, thus Ajivikam coined into Aaseevakam.

The idea of Aaseevaham in Tamil Nadu reestablished and mooted by a group of people including Prof.K.Nedunchezhiyan (follower of E. V. Ramasamy, an atheist), Dr. R. Mathivanan, VCK Ayothidasar, some so called Aaseevaga Sittars (not sure ???), Orissa Balu ( marine researcher), Senthil Mallar (propagandist, his father Asirvatham??? Wrote on this.) and a few other names at recent time.(Need to verify further).

These people were most probably infected with some kind of sickness called ‘Tamil Syndrome’, a kind overly love toward own origin and hallucinating their own glory. Or, working for conversion agents. I guess.(Aaseevaham ‘doctrines’ indicates the hidden agenda which encourages conversions ) 

This propaganda were expanded through time with a well designed documentations by a group named Tamil Chintanaiyalar Peravai (other different post on different names available). 

Origin of Ajivika.

Ajivikam, ( Aaseevagam ) is referring to naked wandering ascetics or also called Makkhaliyar. It is a product or brain child of / by Makkhali Gosala about 484 BC (500-250 BC) from Magadha, Uttar Pradesh, India. He is NOT a Tamil or from Tamil Nadu. His father, Mankha make living by selling images (idols). He lives in a cowshed with the mother, Badha. He is an atheist, Makkhali himself not sure if God exist. He followed naked wandering ascetic life after escaped from his master (landlord). He escaped naked, wondered around until saved by some other Sadhus such as Kapalikas (Shaivites). Then only he became a ‘Sithar’ ( Sadhu / monk). Unfortunately, he never achieved realisation, he never realised the existence of God. He believes FATE, not believing Karma. Towards his end of life, he thinks his ‘God’ named ‘Hallah’, Hallah like a bamboo root. Most of his time past in dance, drunk or remain quiet. 

Buddhism and Jainism were branched out from Ajivikam and became rivalry to each other. Makkhali had taught Mahavira (Jain) and Gautama (Buddhist) earlier but separated because different interpretations of doctrines. (Got different opinions about the relation betweem the three)

Aseevagam is nastikam (a teaching of denying / skeptical on the existence of God). So, how can Aaseevagars believing Lord Subramaniam or other Hindu Gods and Goddesses as Divine Beings?

If we study their claims in detail through their propagations, speeches, videos, articles which are available now on Internet about this cult. It clearly indicates that they have fabricated Sanatana Dharmic Core Doctrines and reproduced a very well designed, imagined and manipulated documents, the so called ‘facts’ about their cult. We can clearly see the actual deceiving and camouflaging propaganda in progress to break Hindus and Hinduism. Splitting the Hindus is their important agenda, it will be easy for them to convert Hindus to other religions if they are able to convince the to believe themselves (Hindus) as atheist!

Aaseevahars or Ajivikas believe the existence of atman (soul), BUT do not believe the existence of Paramaatman ( Brahman / God), thus they are claiming that, they are worshiping ancestors recently. We can see Chinese people going to cemetery to pray their ancestors. If these Tamilism group is really believes ancestors worshipper, they should do like the Chinese, go to cemetery ( NOT TEMPLE) to pray their ancestors. In line to ancestors worship, they are claiming Hindu God and Goddesses as their ancestors. It is an attempt to demean and degrade Hindu Gods. It is a pre-planned, underground movement and a systematic method to deceive and destroy Hinduism from within. 

‘Golden Era’ of Aaseevaham? 

( Kalabra, Dark age of Tamil Nadu as per History) 

There is no such age of golden period for Aaseevaham because Ajivikas were eliminated during Asoka reign. Those escaped from Asoka scattered around. Some escaped to south.

This so called Aaseevagars assume that Kallapirar (Kalabra) era (250 AD to 550 AD +- ) as golden age for Tamils. But during Kalabra reign, Jainism and Buddhism spread well, and at later period Shaivism and Vaishnavism took over and spread in Tamil Nadu. Nowhere Aaseevaham practiced. 

The era of anti Vedas and anti divinity by Ajivika, Jain, Buddhist, Carvaka, Ajnana etc. existed during 500 BC - 500 AD. Ajivikas flourished during Bindusara (Maurya Empire 297 - 273 BC). Asoka ( 268 - 232 BC ) son of Bindusara, converted to Buddhism. Later, Asoka eliminated Ajivikas from Northern part of India, some of them escaped to Kannada and Tamil Nadu. So, Aaseevaham is a died cult, doesn't EXIST anymore. Some  anti-Hindu Tamils try to revive it in order to confuse the Tamil Hindus.

Scriptures of Aaseevagam?

There is no original text or scriptures about Ajivikas, most of informations were extracted from Jain text and Buddhist text in Pali. NO original text in Tamil. For example, Neelakesi scripture is a Jain text. No single word mentioned in any of Hindu Scriptures or Tamil Sangam Literatures.

They claim Thirukural is their (Aaseevaham) scripture. Thiruvalluvar is claimed as a Samanar aaseevagar because of more secular nature of views in Thirukural. They ignored or blind themselves to the first verse in Thirukural mentioned about Bhagavan (God). They accept Tolkappiyam as their scripture for its Tamil language contributions. All the other scriptures refers to Divinity of Hinduism (Brahmins, Sanskrit, Vedanta, etc.) were rejected by them. 

Aasevagam have a new fabricated, well designed documentations by a group named Tamil Chintanaiyalar Peravai. It is best to rename the group as Tamil Karpanaiyalar Peravai. ( Chintanaiyalar means thinker, Karpanaiyalar means dreamer ) Because the method of proving (if study their videos on YouTube will reveal their mockery) their ‘theory’ is by assuming and imagining with their own coined words then relate it with other languages, religions and its meanings. There is no solid authentic evidence to support their claims. They tried to associate their claims with some archeology evidence but it is dubious. Their major ‘ evidence ‘ from literature and own coined terminologies. It is all were imagined, falsified and faked. 

There are many videos on Youtube by this propagandist group with their imagined information about so called ‘facts’ about Aaseevaham or Tamil religion. Actually, it was a hijacked version of Hinduism with the elimination of Divinity, Vedic and Sanskrit influences. These group had reproduced almost all the Hindu fundamental teachings in to their distorted, manipulated versions of stories. 

They claim further, not only Hinduism but all other religions, languages, civilizations etc. were originated from Aaseevakam of Tamil Nadu. 

The ‘Tamil Syndrome' is chronic among Tamils from lower socioeconomic groups such as Paraiyar, Pallar, Mallar, Kuravar, Kallar and etc are considered as Aaseevagars, listed by the so called Tamil Chintanaiyalar Peravai. This is RIDICULOUS. 

Be aware, the so claimed Aaseevaham is a ploy.

Their modus operandi is to break the unity among Indians and Hindus. By destroying unity among Indians and Hindus, they can easily impose their agenda. 

Aaseevaham is an anti Hinduism cult, full of lies, slanders and blasphemy against Hindu scriptures and God. 

To be continued in part 4

Om Namah Shivaya 

Sri Sivasiddhi.

Sivasiddhi Spiritual Foundation Malaysia

Adviser : Anmiga Sagotharar

16 July 2018

Part 1

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=1861071034202098&id=1637620529880484

Part 2.

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=1865858180390050&id=1637620529880484

Aaseevagam: Atheistic Folly Cult. Part 1

Aaseevagam: Atheist  Folly Cult.
A Ploy to Deceive and Destroy Hinduism.


<script async src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.
com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<script> (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({
 google_ad_client: "ca-pub-2960278825814307",
 enable_page_level_ads: true});


Part 1.

Dear Muruga Bhaktas.
Clear the Doubts. Hindu VS Tamilam.

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=1861071034202098&id=1637620529880484

1.To the Hindus.
If you believe Muruga Peruman is the PARAMPORUL ( Paramatman, Brahman, GOD), You also call HIM as Arumugan, Alagan, Skandan, Karthikeyan, Kathirvelan ,Subramanyan, Shiva Shakti Maintan, etc.

You are called as a Kaumara or Shanmatha, or Sanmargi or Sanathana dharmi or Smarta or Vedanti and in the worldwide known as a Hindu. No doubt.

Then, your worship place is Alayam ( Temple). You should go to any Murugan temples to pray. If you are not sure, please refer to the Hindus ( Shanmathas) .

BUT

2.Tamilam Followers ( Tamil Religion NOT Tamil Shaivites)
If you think Muruga Peruman is your Mupattan ( Great grandfather/ Munnor /Ancestor), is an ordinary HUMAN.

You call it as ancestor worship ( Mupattan valipadhu) also as Aseevakam ( Ajivikam) or Tamil Samayam or Tamilam or Tamilism or Tamil Religion , etc.
and around the world your are unknown. 

If the mupattan or munnor valipadu you mentioned refer to Kulacara ( Kula Devi / Shaktism ) or Kaval Deivam, than no issue, you are still within Hindu fold. But aseevakam ( ajivikam) is referring to atheistic, which rejecting the existence of Paramporul (God). It is a problem. Lord Murugan did reincarnated in Tamilakam, no issue on that. But, if Murugan (is mupattan as aaseevaham claims) was said had propagated the teaching of aseevakam to Tamils, as claims by some groups. If so.

Then, your worship place is Idukadhu ( Burial ground /Cemetery ). You should go to your ancestor’s cemetery to pray. If your great grandfather’s name is Murugan, no problem. If you are not sure how to pray, please refer to the Chinese. They know better. Temple is NOT your place of worship.

3.Conclusion
Hindus see God in human and sees human as God. But we aware very well that the man cannot become God in his human form. Even the Avatara purushas lived within the conditions of the physical body. No doubt on that. But we Hindus REJECTS any attempt to demean or degrade the almighty Paramporul into human (by equating or comparing with other religious teaching, for example we have heard that there were attempts to degrade Hindu Gods into the Prophets of Abrahamic religions follower). If you are still confused, please do not hesitate to consult the Hindus. Clear the doubt.

Unity is the core of strength of any society. Most of Indian Hindu families in Malaysia are mixed with Tamils, Telugus, Malayalees and other Indian origins. We must united together as Hindu.

Om Saravanabhava.
Om Namashivaya.

Sri Sivasiddhi
Sivasiddhi Spiritual Foundation Malaysia
Adviser : Anmiga Sagotharar
A Sanathana dharmi, a Shanmatha, a Sanmargi, a Smartha, the World knows me as a Hindu
6 July 2018

Part 2.
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=1865858180390050&id=1637620529880484

Part 3

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=1870884563220745&id=1637620529880484

Aaseevagam: Atheistic Folly Cult. Part 2

Aaseevagam: Atheistic  Folly Cult.
A Ploy to Deceive and Destroy Hinduism.

<script async src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.
com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<script>
     (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({
          google_ad_client: "ca-pub-2960278825814307",
          enable_page_level_ads: true
     });
</script>

Part 2.
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=1865858180390050&id=1637620529880484

Other terms used for this so called religion as Aaseevaham or Ajivikam or Tamilism or Tamil Samayam or Tamil Religion or Tamilam or Tamil Samanam (Exclude Shaivism). In my opinion, the best can define as A Folly Cult. It is a new modus operandi designed to destroy Hinduism from within.

Introduction.

First of all, there is NO such thing can be defined as Tamil Religion. Because there were NO SCRIPTURE mentioned the WORD Tamil Religion (Samayam). No scripture  or Sangam Literatures described or mentioned about the so called Aaseevaham. 

The so called Tamil Religion is extensively referred as Aaseevaham is actually referring to Ajivika (atheistic, alien to Tamils and Tamil Nadu ) teaching on rejecting God ( Brahman, Paramatman, Paramporul). Mentioned in Pali Buddhist and Jain texts.

The word Tamil is either defining a race or a language or a culture and etc. But definitely NOT a religion.

Shaivism totally God (Paramporul) centric religion. Shaivism accepts Shivaperuman as core belief of Paramporul. Contrary to elements of Aaseevaham is an absolute anti God, thus anti Shaivism and anti Hinduism. So, Hindus especially Shaivites be aware, Aaseevaham is a ploy to deceive and destroy Hinduism. A large portion of Tamils are either following Shaivism or Vainavaism which are within the Hindu fold. Our Hindu dharma or Sanatana Dharma or Shanmatham or Sanmargam consists of Shaiva, Vaishnava, Shakta, Ganapatim, Kaumara and Sauram. So, Shaivam within Hindu fold.

A certain Tamilian group of people are claiming that they are follower of Tamil Religion (Aaseevaham) and they are NOT Hindus. They totally rejecting Hinduism (Sanatana Dharma) They are claiming the word ‘Hindu’ never mentioned in Hindu scriptures, (yes it is true). The word was given by foreigner from Persia and later used by British to identify us. But the whole world recognizes Sanatana Dharma in the name of Hindu. So, it shouldn’t be an issue. These Aaseevagars are actually the anti Hindu agents. Their agenda is to destroy Hinduism from within by camouflaging in the name of Shaiva.

Who are Propagating Aaseevaham?

A section of Tamils from Tamil Nadu, India. Most of them are NON Hindus (pretending to be Shaivites) and a small group of Hindu Shaivites ( deceived by the folly of Aaseevaham ).The propagates are consists of three groups

1. Race and Language Motivated Group.
These groups love the sentiment of race and language. These groups were mixed with both Hindus and non Hindus. It is nothing wrong if one have race and language sentiment. If one doesn't love and feel proud of their own race, he is denying his own origin. Everyone should love the race. But, these so called Aaseevagars were actually deceived by the anti Hindu agents in order to get support and fund probably. (Seeman’s political ploy)

2. Religious Motivated Group.
a. Anti Hindu groups

i. Such as atheists (Nastikas)
Most probably working with other anti Hindu agents.

ii. Abrahamic followers but pretending as Shaivites ( Example, Seeman himself). They actually are the agents of anti Hindu elements.
Both of them have their own hidden agenda to destroy Hinduism.

b. A small group of real Shaivism follower whom were deceived by the Aaseevaham folly cult. These Hindu group supports without understand the hidden agenda of the folly cult.(Religious ploy)

3.Politically Motivated Groups.
Political agenda in Tamil Nadu, India were used to deceive these Tamils. Seeman’s political agenda and his ambition is main reason for this Aaseevaham cult. Seeman using Tamil sentiment and Aaseevaham cult to break apart Tamils and Telugus in Tamil Nadu for his own gain. The same hatred bigotry attitude is spread out to other nations such in Malaysia. (Seeman’s political ploy)

What are the Aaseevagars Claims?

1. All the Hindu Gods and Goddesses are human. Denying the existence of Paramporul ( God). An attempt to demean and degrade Gods to human ( as in Abrahamic teaching) Claiming only Siddhas of Aaseevagars (ascetics) exist not God. They accepted sadhus from Ajivikas, Jains and Buddhist as true siddhas BUT not Hindu siddhas. Shiva and Murugan deemed as Aaseevagar siddhas NOT God.

2.Denying all the Hindu scriptures. Vedas, Puranas, Mahabharata etc., assumed as ‘cooked up' stories. Created ( designed, fabricated, manipulated, etc.) their own version of Aaseevagam doctrines, own version of ‘Mahabharata’, and ‘Ramayana’, denying the Original Mahabharata of Vyasa and Ramayana of Valmiki.

3.Fabricated and reclaimed almost all the Hindu fundamental teachings. But claims that it was hijacked by the Hindus (Aryans) from them earlier.

4. Having problems of terminology phobia related Hinduism only. They are phobic on words such as Brahmin, Hindu, Hinduism, Arya, India, Hindustan, Sanatana Dharma, Hindutva ( Hindu tatva / Hindu dharma) , Sanskrit or anything relating Hinduism including Shaiva Bhakti Movements ( Aaseevagars rejecting Thiru Nyana Sambanthar )

5. Claims that, Hindus had hijacked their ( Tamils) religion, the so called Aaseevagam from them and later during Adhi Sankaracarya (800AD) , Hinduism were inserted ( forced) on them by Aryans, Dravidians, Telugus and Brahmins after 800 AD. They blame everybody else except themselves.

6. These so called Aaseevagars never condemns any other religions except Hinduism. They never condemn or denies any Abrahamic religions even it were alien to India.

7. Etc…

Aaseevagar’s Aim.

Their aim is to break the unity among Indians and Hindus. By destroying unity among Indians and Hindus, they can easily impose their agenda.
Aaseevaham is an anti Hinduism cult, full of lies, slanders and blasphemy against Hindu scriptures and God.

To be continued in Part 3

Om Namah Shivaya

By Sri Sivasiddhi.
Sivasiddhi Spiritual Foundation Malaysia
Adviser : Anmiga Sagotharar
11 July 2018

Part 1
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=1861071034202098&id=1637620529880484

Part 3

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=1870884563220745&id=1637620529880484

Siri Menjawab Ahmad Iqram Mohd Noor #1.1

Siri Menjawab Ahmad Iqram Mohd Noor #1.1

<script async src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.


com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<script> (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({
 google_ad_client: "ca-pub-2960278825814307",
 enable_page_level_ads: true});

Kepada,
1.Ahmad Iqram Mohd Noor.
(Penulis Buku:
Kau Sembah Apa?  dan
Yahudi, Kristian, Buddha, Hindu Berasal Daripada Islam?, dll)
2. Semua pengikut taksub Ahmad Iqram.

Setelah membaca artikel Ahmad Iqram di blog Rejuvenasi Akal,
Saya rasa tidak ada keperluan  untuk membaca kedua -dua buku berkenaan.  Saya boleh menyimpulkannya sebagai berstandard ‘Bacaria’ atau cerita khayalan dengan sedikit fakta daripada agamanya sendiri. Pendapat saya ini berdasarkan petikan daripada blog beliau kerana banyak menggunakan perkataan - perkataan mungkin, kemungkinan, berpendapat, dll menunjukkan penulis tidak yakin dengan ‘fakta sejarah'nya sendiri. Banyak perkataan, frasa atau ayat samada disalahtafsir, disalahpetik, dimanipulasi, atau diimaginasi oleh penulis terutamanya daripada Kitab Hindu.
Seterusnya beliau ‘MENCIPTA’ formula linguistik bahasa Sanskrit yang tersendiri untuk menegakkan fakta IMAGINASInya.

Artikel Ahmad Iqram Mohd Noor bertajuk, SEMUA AGAMA BERASAL DARI ISLAM? (Jun 14, 2014) di blog beliau Rejuvenasi Akal
https://rejuvenasiakal.wordpress.com/tag/semua-agama-berasal-dari-islam/

Fakta - Fakta Yang Dikemukakan oleh Saudara Ahmad Iqram untuk membuktikan ‘teori’nya.

A.  Faktor Agama Islam.
1.Nabi Adam manusia pertama Islam di muka bumi  berdasarkan kitab Islam.
2.Nabi Ibrahim seorang Islam berdasarkan kitab Islam.

Saya tidak ingin komen dalam bahagian ini yang berdasarkan agama penulis kerana  saya tidak ingin untuk mencampuri urusan agama lain. Tetapi saya MENOLAK ‘teori’ ini berdasarkan fakta sejarah dan Kitab Hindu. (..akan dihuraikan dalam Siri… #2)

B.  Faktor Agama Hindu
1. Orang Arya ialah anak cucu Nabi Ibrahim.
a. Arya dharma ( Hindu) berdasarkan Islam.
b. Brahma ialah Abraham (Nabi Ibrahim) dan Saraswati ialah Sarah.
c. Dalam Kitab Veda terdapat banyak ajaran Nabi Ibrahim.
d. Ram dikaitkan dengan Abram.
e. Ram dan Abraham adalah mungkin orang atau watak yang sama.

Saya MENOLAK kesemua ‘fakta’ faktor agama Hindu. Unsur salah tafsir,  manipulasi,  dipetik diluar konteks, imaginasi dll diguna pakai oleh penulis.  (...akan dihuraikan dalam Siri… #2)

C. Faktor Sejarah
a.  Orang Arya, berkulit putih, dari Parsi, membawa ajaran Nabi Ibrahim ke India. Mengenali Brahma sebagai manusia, tetapi kemudian disalah anggap oleh orang Arya, mula menyembah Brahma sebagai Tuhan.
b.  Orang Dravida, hitam, dari Indus, pindah ke  selatan India. sembah pelbagai Tuhan (politeism)

Saya MENOLAK kesemua faktor ini. Pakar sejarah dari Jabatan Sejarah di universiti tempatan atau luar mana yang mengesahkan ini? ( ...akan dihuraikan dalam  Siri… #2

D. Faktor Bahasa  Sanskrit
Bahasa Sanskrit dimanipulasi mengikut nafsu sendiri dan kepentingan penulis. Samada ia merupakan kebodohan atau percubaan fitnah. Contoh, manipulasi prefix A ( tidak)  +  Gama (huru - hara) = agama ( tidak huru - hara) , menggunakan prefix bahasa dengan andaian sendiri.

Paling kelakar yang saya pernah baca. Perbuatan yang paling bodoh dilakukan oleh penulis dalam percubaan untuk memperbodohkan orang ramai.  ( ..dihuraikan dalam Siri ini … #1)

E. Faktor Imaginasi dan Manipulasi.
Ahmad Iqram banyak menggunakan unsur imaginasi dan andaian sendiri atau andaian orang lain. Contohnya daripada artikel beliau,

Sejarawan Arab berpendapat… pasti...Hindu berasal dari Abraham.
a. Ram dan Abraham  mungkin watak yang sama . Ab (Ayah) + raham = Abraham.
b. Ab / Ap ( bapa)+ Ram = Abram  = Abraham.
c. Brahm ( Brahma)  kemungkinan berasal dari Ram.

Sekiranya unsur imaginasi seperti ini diterima sebagai fakta,  maka kita boleh membuat pelbagai andaian lain yang akan menjadi fitnah agama.  Unsur manipulasi dan imaginasi hanya sesuai untuk majalah dongeng. (...akan dihuraikan dalam  Siri… #2)

Berdasarkan petikannya, Dua Persoalan Utama dapat dikenalpasti.

Persoalan 1.
Ahmad Iqram mendakwa bahawa agama Hindu bukanlah agama tauhid yang pertama atau tertua dunia. Sebaliknya Ahmad Iqram mempercayai dan mengandaikan bahawa agama Islam yang sebenarnya agama tertua.

Petikan daripada post Ahmad Iqram,
 “Saya telah nyatakan bukti bahawa agama Tauhid yang pertama itu adalah Islam yang di bawa oleh Nabi Adam. ke Nabi Ibrahim sehinggalah Nabi Muhammad.”

Saudara,  jika saudara PERCAYA bahawa,

“agama Tauhid yang pertama itu adalah Islam yang di bawa oleh Nabi Adam ke Nabi Ibrahim sehinggalah Nabi Muhammad.”

Saya TIDAK ada masalah atau halangan, sebab itu hak saudara untuk mempercayai seperti mana tuntutan agama saudara berdasarkan kitab agama saudara, saya HORMATI kepercayaan saudara.

TETAPI, jika saudara berkata bahawa saudara telah membuktinya berdasarkan FAKTA perbandingan agama dan sejarah,  dibandingkan dengan agama Hindu, saya MENOLAK ‘teori’ imaginasi saudara ini. (
...akan dihuraikan dalam Siri… #2)

Persoalan  2
Agama Hindu Berasal Dari Islam?

Ahmad  Iqram mendakwa agama Hindu berasal daripada agama Islam, ini  ialah kerana Ahmad Iqram membuat andaian sendiri  bahawa orang Arya mengamalkan dan membawa ajaran Nabi Ibrahim ke India. Kemudian setelah berinteraksi dengan penduduk tempatan (Dravida), mereka telah terpesong dan menjadi syirik. Ahmad Iqram mengemukan ‘fakta’ daripada Kitab Hindu.

Saya MENOLAK ‘teori’ ini. Agama Hindu ialah agama tertua dunia yang masih diamalkan sehingga ke hari ini. Sudah PASTI agama Hindu tidak berasal dari mana -mana agama lain.  Agama Hindu ialah IBU kepada agama lain. Kitab Hindu disalah tafsir dan dimanipulasi mengikut kehendak dan nafsu fitnah penulis. (...akan dihuraikan dalam Siri… #2)

Saya MENOLAK  ‘teori’  atau khayalan Ahmad Iqram Mohd Noor berdasarkan pelbagai sebab.

Sebagai permulaan, mari kita melihat daripada faktor D,  FAKTOR BAHASA  SANSKRIT .

Analogi Literal Bahasa Sanskrit (prefix bahasa)

Petikan daripada artikel saudara,

 “… dalam bahasa Sanskrit A itu bermaksud ‘tidak’ seperti perkataan ‘agama’, a itu bermaksud tidak, gama itu bermaksud huru-hara yang memberi makna tidak huruhara. Di dalam analogi literal bahasa Sanskrit membuang perkataan A daripada perkataan Abraham lalu disebut dengan Braham atau Brahma.”

Jikalau ‘teori’ saudara dipersetujui  sebagai sahih (diterima pakar bahasa) maka berdasarkan ‘teori /analogi’ saudara, saya juga dapat/boleh membuat pelbagai ‘teori’ literal bahasa Sanskrit  yang baharu, contohnya,
a.  Brahman (Tuhan) … .Abrahman (Bukan  Tuhan)
b. Brahma (Tuhan Pencipta)..... Abrahma (bukan Tuhan Pencipta)
c. Dll.
Saudara, dalam bahasa Sanskrit, perkataan AGAMA bermaksud aturan, peraturan (syariat),  manakala perkataan berlawanan untuk agama ialah NIGAMA bermaksud tiada aturan atau tiada peraturan ,melanggar syariat. Prefix ‘ A ‘ diganti dengan agama prefix ‘ Ni ‘. Untuk pengetahuan saudara,  ada banyak prefix yang berbeza yang lain  yang sebegini digunakan dalam bahasa Sanskrit  berdasarkan perkataan dan kesesuaian penggunaan ayat.

Berdasarkan kedua -dua contoh diatas, sekiranya kita berpegang kepada analogi prefix ‘ a ‘  dengan tanpa  ‘ a ‘ cara saudara  Ahmad Iqram, maka Abrahman bermaksud BUKAN Tuhan, iaitu boleh dikatakan Setan . Manakala Abrahma pula boleh disimpulkan sebagai BUKAN Tuhan Pencipta  atau setan pemusnah.  ( Secara peribadi, saya pasti analogi ini salah)

Boleh saya tahu,
1. Siapakah guru bahasa Sanskrit saudara yang mengajar maksud gama dan agama kepada saudara sehingga membawa kepada analogi literal sedemikian? Zakir ke?
2. Adakah saudara pakar linguistik Sanskrit?
3. Adakah saudara tahu membaca bahasa Sanskrit?

Kesemua ‘fakta’ atau faktor - faktor Ahmad Iqram boleh dipertikaikan. Faktor - faktor lain akan dihuraikan atau  dipertikaikan secara  TERPERINCI dalam bahagian Siri Menjawab Ahmad Iqram Mohd Noor #2

Saudara Ahmad Iqram,
Satu  artikel itu cukup untuk menilai buku - buku fantasi saudara. Saudara perlu WARAS dalam menghurai atau menilai hal - hal yang berkaitan agama, lebih -lebih apabila menyibuk diri dalam hal agama lain yang tidak tahu hukum - hakamnya. Perbuatan sebegini sebenarnya  ialah  percubaan / usaha menghina agama Hindu, dan/tetapi tanpa disedari saudara sedang menghina agama saudara sendiri. Sedarlah diri.

Saya mencabar saudara Ahmad Iqram untuk menjawab surat /post ini. Saya boleh membuktikan kesemua ‘fakta’ yang dikemukakan saudara tiada nilai fakta,  ianya hanya andaian dan imaginasi saudara berpandukan nafsu taksub agama.

Sekiranya saudara benar, saudara ingin membuktikan kebenaran ‘fakta’ saudara, saya boleh berdebat secara langsung atau tertutup.

Yang jelas , Zakir Naik BERJAYA memperbodohkan lebih ramai orang seagamanya.

Om Namah Shivaya.

Sri  Sivasiddhi
Sivasiddhi Spiritual Foundation  Malaysia.

11 Mac 2018.
S. K.
1.Ahmad Iqram Mohd Noor
   (messenger fb)
2. Firdaus Wong Wai Hung
    Official  (messenger fb)
3. Malaysia Hindu Sangam
4. Malaysia Hindudharma
    Mamandram
5. Hindu Youth Organization
    Malaysia

An Open Letter to Dr.Zakir Naik: Hindus are Demanding a Public Apology from Zakir Naik

Sivasiddhi Speaks

An Open Letter to Dr.Zakir Naik:  Hindus are Demanding a Public Apology from Zakir Naik.

<script async src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- sivasiddhi1082_main_Blog1_1x1_as -->
<ins class="adsbygoogle"
     style="display:block"
     data-ad-client="ca-pub-2960278825814307"
     data-ad-slot="9143843878"
     data-ad-format="auto"
     data-full-width-responsive="true"></ins>
<script>
     (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
</script>

Through,
1. Malaysia Hindudharma 
     Mamandram
2. Malaysia Hindu Sangam
3. Mahaasabha Malaysia

Demanding a Public Apology from Zakir Naik

On behalf of Hindus, I am demanding a public apology from you for misleading the public in general with wrong information on Hinduism.

Hindus are aware the  lies,slander and blasphemy on Hinduism and God by yourself, Dr Zakir Naik (the self proclaimed comparative religion scholar)

1.Summary of Zakir’s Method / Modus Oprandi.
a. Comparative religion of Zakir. Not comparing but condemning
b. Common term of Zakir based to his belief, look into similarity of religion
c. Pick only suitable verses which accommodates his  ideology/ propaganda. Don't have the full knowledge.
d. Tries to prove Hindus  are wrong or wronged by scriptures,interpretation or scholarly. (Pseudo science)
e. Tries/ claims only his belief/religion in true path.
f. Invites people to his belief.

2.Zakir’s Modus Operandi on Religion Conversion in Detail

Zakir’s modus operandi on religion conversion is simple.
His propaganda is ‘come into the common term’. He calls everyone look into what is common in religions and follow it.( His famous talk is about Similarity between Islam and Hinduism). He tries to prove Islam and Hinduism is same.
The problem is ,his analogy of common term is based to his own religion, Islam.  Whatever ideologies which are compromises Islam assumed/deemed as common term,neglecting all the other religion's fundamentals.Basic fundamental Islamic teaching is used as threshold. (This is against the ethics of Comparative Religions).

3.Basic Teaching of Islam used to demean Hinduism. (Hindus got no issues on Islamic belief)

a)Islam believes one God which has no image,no children,no parents,etc. So Zakir picked whichever verses from Hindu Scriptures suites his belief. Among that the most widely used by Zakir is Yajur Veda 32.3 natasya pratima asti. (Chan.Up 6:2:1, Shv Up 6:9,Shv Up 4:19,Shv Up 4:20,...and many more). The idea of God has no image is not a contradiction to Hindu religion because Brahman is also in formless form,only one,etc. No issue here. Infact Hinduism is the earliest religion taught the world about it.

b) Islam Prohibits Idol Worship.

 So Zakir picked the verses from Hindu Scriptures  which he THINKS that  prohibits idol worship. He widely used verse ,
( i ) Yajur Veda 40.9 in distorted version. Misconception of Zakir,he says Sambhuti as created things ( picture,idol,etc)and Asambhuti as  natural things (air,water,fire etc.) He hides the real meaning and other related verses ( YV 40.10-11).  Most controversial part which he tries to put Hinduism at wrong.  But YV 40.11 is clear evidence of Zakir’s ‘pseudo science’ bigotry attitude.YV40.9 actually says those who ONLY believes  God in formless form is in darkness and those ONLY believes God in form is in the further darkness. YV 40.11 says one who believes  BOTH ,God in form and formless is the real bhakta,will reach his abode.
 ( ii ) BG. 7.20 - ‘those intelligence has been stolen by material desire desires surrender unto demigods’, again it is a misconception of Zakir with bad faith. The actual meaning is not related to prohibiting idol worship.  There is nowhere written about prohibition of idol worship.
Can Zakir prove ,which exact verse in any of Hindu Scriptures prohibits idol/murthy worship? (We can see clearly the lies and slander of Zakir)

c) Prophet Muhammad is the Last Messenger.

Prophet Muhammad is the final messenger of God. So Zakir try to prove that Prophet is the final messenger for Hindus and claims that the name of Prophet had been predicted/mentioned in Hindu Scriptures. Zakir’s claim,
(i) Zakir claims Kalki Avatar is the Prophet Muhammad based to Kalki Purana. ( This is a blatant lie. Kalki Avatar has 2 wives, has son, His parents lives up to old age,has 3 brothers etc. as in Kalki Purana)
(ii) A few selective words (either translated into Arabic in his own correct manipulated meaning or based to language phonetic) such as Narashangsa, Kaurama, Rebb,Ahamathi etc.from Vedas he picked to prove his claim that they are referring to  Prophet. ( It is a total manipulations of Hindu scriptures)
( iii) Changed the Bhavisya Purana story to suite his propaganda to prove his claim about Prophet. Bhavisya puran mentions about demoniac ghost of tripurasura (reincarnated) named Mahamada whom will bring adharmic  religion during kaliyuga.

d) Mecca is the Kiblat

Mecca is the  Kiblat (centre point) for Islam. So Zakir try to prove that it is mentioned in Hindu Scriptures in Kuntap Sukta,Atharvaveda. (not related / never mention about Mecca)

e) Islam Believes in One Life (No Rebirth)
 So Zakir tries to prove that there is nothing written about rebirth or samsara in any Hindu Scriptures. There MANY verses in Hindu Scriptures.

f) Islam Believes in One True God.

So Zakir claims that Hindu religions believes  False God. Example,
(i) Zakir questioned on Chaturti day of  Ganesha, to prove if Ganesha is a true God,if proved he will eat prasad of Ganesha temple.
 (ii) Zakir questioned how come Shiva cannot recognised His own son Ganesha.
(iii) Zakir claimed Krishna married 16108  wives,etc. These are/were blasphemy against Hindu Gods.

g) Quran is the  authentic scripture. ( Hindus got no problem on this)
etc.

Zakir used the above hypothesis and claims that Hindus were wronged by our pandits on Hindu Scriptures. The real teaching of Hinduism is in accordance with Islam as per Hindu Scriptures. He  is advising Hindus to convert to Islam.  Actually Zakir  manipulated,misquoted,mistranslated with his own understandings and imaginations  to confuse the Hindus,so that he can convert them into Islam.

 All the quotes and references were either,
(i) quoted part of true verses
 (ii)  taken out of context
(iii) changed the words to suite his propaganda
(iv) mistranslated with his own correct words/meanings.

Lies and blasphemy of Zakir on Hinduism
Lie no.1. Zakir says "Vedas prohibits idol worship."  There is no word of prohibition. Ask Zakir to prove which exact verse says that? Which verses says God cannot /will not take form?.THERE IS NON
Lie no.2.  Zakir claims " rebirth never mentioned in Vedas." THERE ARE MANY verses from Hindu scriptures.
Lie no.3. Zakir claims his" Prophet's name was predicted in Hindu scripture" . This is another blatant lie.THERE IS NO SINGLE WORD mentioned in any scriptures ...by believing his theory of prediction he became syirik and made all the muslims who believe that also syirik!
Lie no.4.  Zakir claims his Prophet is the Kalki Avatar of Vishnu.This blasphemy against Vishnu the God. KALKI is avatar. Another total lie of Zakir.If his claim is true than he is accepting the other avatars of Vishnu and prophet as avatar or God. This is associating prophet/Kalki with God/Allah. The graves sin in Islam
Lie no.5  Zakir changed the entire story of Bhavisya purana . He made the Mahamada(demoniac ghost) as the saviour of mankind.
Lie no.6  Zakir said Krishna had 16108 wives. It is blasphemy against Krishna.
Lie no. 7  Zakir had insulted Hindu God Ganesha during celebrations and Shiva.

Zakir is a liar,slanderer and blasphemer against Hinduism and God. So that Hindus demand a public apology from Zakir.

Om Kali Maataki Jay.

By Sri Sivasiddhi
Sivasiddhi Spiritual Foundation
Malaysia.
29 September 2017

C.c
1. Malaysia Hindudharma Mamandram
2. Malaysia Hindu Sangam
3. Mahaasabha Malaysia.
4. Dr Zakir Naik

P/s. To Zakir and the so called students of Zakir,you are welcome to defend the arguments above in any open interactions.

 #SivasiddhiSpeaks
# Sivasiddhi Speaks

4 Soalan Yang Membongkar Pembohongan Dan Kebodohan Zakir

4 Soalan Yang Membongkar Pembohongan Dan
Kebodohan Zakir.

<script async src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<script>
     (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({
          google_ad_client: "ca-pub-2960278825814307",
          enable_page_level_ads: true
     });
</script>

‘Teori’  Zakir : Kalki Avatar ialah Nabi Muhammad.

Zakir Memperbodohkan Anda!

Soalan 1.

 “Zakir seorang Islam berkata ' Nabi ialah Kalki'. Kalki avatar ( jelmaan Vishnu ) diterima dan diakui  dengan penuh kepercayaan oleh Zakir sebagai Nabi Muhammad.”  Secara tidak langsung, Zakir juga mengakui kesahihan kitab Hindu.

Soalan.
 Adakah anda  percaya Zakir bercakap benar dalam cerita ( ‘teori’) Kalki ialah Nabi?

Jawab.   Ya atau Tidak

( Kalau ya, bermaksud Zakir benar. Anda setuju dengan teori Zakir.
Kalau tidak, bermaksud Zakir bohong. Anda setuju bahawa Zakir ialah pembohong)

Jika anda menjawab ya dalam soalan 1. Sila jawab soalan seterusnya. Andaikan ya.

Soalan 2.
 “Avatar  Vishnu sebanyak  24 kesemuanya termasuk Kalki. Sekiranya Kalki diterima sebagai Nabi Islam. Maka avatar-avatar lain Vishnu juga ialah / semestinya merupakan mana -mana Nabi Islam yang lebih awal.Selaras dengan teori Zakir dari segi logik.

Soalan.
 Adakah anda menerima / setuju bahawa  avatar-avatar Vishnu  yang lain juga merupakan Nabi- Nabi Islam yang lebih awal?  (Peringatan: Anda setuju Kalki ialah Nabi dalam soalan 1.)

Jawab.  Ya atau Tidak

( Kalau ya, bermaksud Zakir benar. Selari dengan teori Zakir,Nabi ialah Kalki.
Kalau tidak, bermaksud Zakir membohongi anda.

Anda terpaksa menjawab ya dalam soalan  2  kalau anda percaya Zakir.

Soalan 3.
“Dikalangan 24 Avatar Vishnu ada di antaranya bukan dalam  bentuk manusia. Vishnu telah menjelma dalam bentuk rupa ikan ( Matsya avatara ), rupa singa ( Simha Avatara ), rupa penyu ( Kurma Avatara ) dan sebagainya.
Selaras dengan teori Zakir dari segi logik, kesemua Avatar Vishnu sepatutnya Nabi- Nabi yang lebih awal.

Soalan.
Adakah anda  percaya bahawa Nabi - Nabi Islam pernah lahir dalam bentuk rupa haiwan atau menggunakan nama haiwan?
Peringatan: Anda setuju Kalki ialah Nabi dalam soalan 1 dan 2.

Jawab.  Ya atau Tidak
( Kalau ya, bermaksud Zakir benar.Selari dengan teori Zakir,Nabi ialah Kalki.
Kalau tidak, bermaksud Zakir bohong. Bercanggah dengan teori Zakir)

Anda terpaksa menjawab ya dalam soalan  3 kalau percaya Zakir.

Soalan 4.

Antara Avatar Vishnu yang berupa haiwan ialah rupa bentuk babi / khinzir ( Varaha Avatar). Babi / Khinzir dan Islam amat bertentangan, ia merupakan haram bagi orang seagama dengan Zakir. Avatara babi / khinzir  ( Vishnu) juga selaras dengan teori Zakir dari segi logik, perlu diterima sebagai Nabi Islam !

Soalan.
Adakah anda masih setuju  bahawa seorang Nabi Islam terdahulu pernah hidup dalam rupa babi / khinzir atau atas nama babi?
Peringatan: Anda setuju Kalki ialah Nabi dalam soalan 1 ,2 dan 3.

Jawab.  Ya atau Tidak

( Kalau ya, bermaksud Zakir benar.Selari dengan teori Zakir,Nabi ialah Kalki.
Kalau tidak, bermaksud Zakir bohong. Bercanggah dengan teori Zakir)

Anda terpaksa menjawab ya dalam soalan  4 kalau percaya Zakir. Anda terpaksa menerima avatar babi sebagai Nabi Islam.

Perbezaan antara Kalki dengan Nabi Muhammad.

Mengikut Kalki Purana,
a.Kalki ada 2 isteri.....Nabi ada banyak isteri.
b. Kalki ada  abang.... Nabi tiada abang.
c. Ibubapa Kalki hidup sampai usia tua.....Nabi yatim/ piatu.
d.Kalki ada anak lelaki….Nabi tiada anak lelaki.
e.Kalki dan 3 companion …...Nabi dan 4 Sahabat.
f. Dll…

Kesimpulan.
Teori Zakir ,Kalki ialah Nabi Muhammad mendorong kepada pernyataan bahawa Avatar- Avatar Vishnu yang lain juga ialah Nabi-Nabi Islam terdahulu. Jika Zakir benar, maka Varaha Avatar ( babi) juga sepatutnya diterima sebagai Nabi Islam terdahulu dari segi logik Zakir. Jika anda menolak , maka Zakir adalah PEMBOHONG.

Tepuk minda tanya logiknya.
Adakah Zakir berada di jalan benar atau berbohong?
Zakir sedang memperbodohkan siapa?

Om Maa Kali Jay.
Sri Sivasiddhi.
Sivasiddhi Spiritual Foundation
Malaysia.
5 November 2017

Surat Terbuka Umum

Surat Terbuka Umum.

Kepada,
Para Muslim yang Mukmin.
Pihak- Pihak yang berkenaan.

Firdaus Wong Wai Hung Official Menghina Agama Hindu.

Firdaus Wong dan organisasi MRM melalui posting fb di
Firdaus  Wong Wai Hung Official menghina agama Hindu dengan alasan hendak menjawab seseorang. Artikel asal tidak dapat diakses.( Kemungkinan besar telah dipadam oleh beliau )
Link asal.
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=1423323867778595&id=285669801544013

Salinan artikel Firdaus Wong berkenaan dalam simpanan saya. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1SaEmh4emKGPW3l_94tp96YqMwJHWkB1Vy5sWRgaE7s8/edit?usp=drivesdk

Modus Operandi menghina agama Hindu.

Firdaus Wong menghina agama Hindu dengan alasan hendak menjawap persoalan atau pendapat seseorang.

Petikan daripada artikel beliau.
“Jawapan Kepada Tuduhan Kononnya Kaabah Adalah Kuil Siva ‘Kaabalishwaran’ & Dalamnya Ada Siva Lingam”
...Idea ini dicetuskan oleh seorang penulis Hindu bernama Purushottam Nagesh Oak”

Saya setuju dengan tindakan Saudara Firdaus bertanya atau menjawap penulis berkenaan atau sesiapa yang menggunakan ia sebagai sumbernya. Patut membuat laporan polis dan ambil tindakan yang sewajarnya.  Saya sokong.

Tetapi, saya amat tidak bersetuju dan membantah tindakan saudara Firdaus Wong menghina agama Hindu dengan alasan menjawab seseorang. Bukti Firdaus menghina agama Hindu.

a)Pernyataan dalam artikel Saudara Firdaus, mengaitkan Tuhan Siva dengan syaitan.
“... mengaitkan bahawa imej Siva memiliki lembing trisula itu pengaruh dari dewa Greek iaitu Poseidon? atau imej Devil yang sering kali digambarkan syaitan berwarna merah memiliki trisula seperti Siva? “...”kemudian mengaku tidak wajar berbuat demikian … “

Pernyataan atau persoalan begini salah, ia tidak harus di kaitkan atau diutarakan walaupun dalam bentuk persoalan untuk paparan dikalangan umum. Sebarang posting dalam bentuk persoalan juga boleh menyampaikan idea tertentu.

Adakah seseorang terutamanya bukan daripada agama tuan, boleh mengeluarkan persoalan-persoalan sensitif mengenai agama tuan secara terbuka dikalangan umum?

b) Pernyataan dalam artikel Saudara Firdaus mengenai Siva Linga sebagai alat sulit. Pandangan begini adalah sangat menghina dan hanya akan dilakukan manusia jenis bangsat ,pariah atau mlecha seperti Swami Balendu). Hanya golongan yang malang akan berfikiran demikian.

Petikan dari artikel Firdaus,
“... Lingam bermaksud kemaluan atau simbol bagi Siva. Manakala Yoni pula bermaksud faraj atau kemaluan bagi dewi atau Shakti. Namun ada segelintir yang membuat laporan polis kononnya kami menghina dan mengfitnah agama Hindu dengan mengatakan Lingam & Yoni bukannya kemaluan lelaki dan perempuan.

Bukan kami yang mencipta idea Lingam dan Yoni adalah kemaluan lelaki dan wanita tetapi para sarjana Hindu sendiri turut mengakuinya? Swami Balendu menulis dalam websitenya "Shiva Lingam - How the Worship of a Penis started in Hinduism"  dan anda boleh membacanya di sini > http://bit.ly/2ndq24H …”

Pernyataan ini salah sama sekali.
Maksud sebenar Siva Linga boleh dirujuk daripada kitab asal versi Sanskrit yang menjelaskan ia sebagai lambang Tuhan yang Mahaagung. Boleh rujuk daripada Atharva Veda, Upanishads, Siva Purana ,Linga Purana, Skanda Purana dan banyak sumber lain.

Sumber Rujukan Yang Tidak Sahih Digunakan.

Sumber Firdaus Wong dalam menulis artikel mengenai Siva Linga itu adalah bukan daripada sumber primer daripada teks asal, versi Sanskrit.

Firdaus Wong jelas menghina dan fitnah mengenai Siva Linga kerana sumber yang tidak sahih daripada sumber Swami Balendu. Adakah Swami Balendu ialah seorang sarjana Hindu seperti yang dinyatakan oleh Firdaus Wong? TIDAK. Balendu ini menyamar sebagai seorang Hindu dengan menggunakan gelaran swami.

1. Swami Balendu ialah seorang atheist, murtad daripada agama Hindu. Ada pengakuannya sendiri.
http://www.dnaindia.com/india/interview-meet-swami-balendu-an-atheist-guru-with-a-non-religious-ashram-in-vrindavan-2113623

2. Percubaan Swami Balendu mengadakan Konferensi Atheist Mathura 14 Oktober 2016. Ditentang oleh Imam Masjid Shahi, Mathura dan Ketua agama Hindu.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/m.timesofindia.com/city/agra/Wife-of-atheist-guru-seeks-German-embassy-help-for-protection-of-her-human-rights/amp_articleshow/55071617.cms

3. Artikel Swami Balendu itu tidak ada sebarang sumber rujukan.Sebuah artikel tanpa sebarang rujukan yang sahih tidak boleh atau patut digunakan sebagai sumber rujukan. Perbuatan begini melanggar etika bidang penulisan ilmiah. Lebih-lebih lagi apabila membawa idea negatif. (sila rujuk artikel dia)

4. Nota Kaki atau bahan rujukan yang digunakan dalam keseluruhan artikel  Firdaus Wong itu hanyalah sumber sekunder. Tiada satu pun di rujuk daripada sumber primer iaitu teks Sanskrit asal.

5. Walaupun sekiranya Firdaus Wong menggunakan teks asal,  siapakah dia untuk mentafsir dan menghurai kitab Hindu? Adakah tafsiran Salman Rushdie mengenai Kitab agamanya boleh diterima oleh Firdaus Wong sebagai sahih? Sudah pasti TIDAK.

Pengunaan sumber-sumber sekunder dan sumber yang tidak sahih dalam penulisan artikel  berkenaan ialah suatu perbuatan menghina agama Hindu.

 Perbuatan Firdaus ini menimbulkan rasa resah dan rasa tidak puas hati dikalangan penganut agama Hindu dan boleh memcetuskan konflik agama dikalangan rakyat Malaysia. Ada di antara komentar yang boleh dilihat menunjukkan rasa  marah di posting fb beliau.

Kredibiliti sumber Firdaus Wong ini samalah seperti menggunakan sumber Salman Rushdie, seorang atheist yang murtad daripada agama Islam, menulis negatif mengenai agama Islam.

Bolehkah seseorang menggunakan sumber Salman Rushdie  atau Wikipedia untuk menulis, mentafsir dan menilai agama tuan - tuan? Adakah Firdaus Wong menggunakan atau mencadangkan penggunaan sumber Salman Rushdie itu sah?

Firdaus Wong Sering Menghina.

Perbuatan menghina agama Hindu sering kali dilakukan oleh Firdaus Wong dan MRM. Ini bukan kali pertama. Terdapat lebih daripada 10 kesalahan oleh Firdaus Wong dan team MRM terhadap agama Hindu.

Saya telah /pernah menulis kepada dalam fb Firdaus Wong sebelum ini untuk meminta penjelasan,  menuntut permohonan maaf dan menarik balik pernyataan tentang pembohongan dan fitnah mengenai agama Hindu daripada fb. Namun kesemua surat -surat ini tidak diendahkan oleh Firdaus.

Senarai Surat Saya.
1. Surat Terbuka. Tidak dijawab.
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=1707474889561714&id=1637620529880484

2. Surat Tuntutan. Tidak dijawab.
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=1737267279915808&id=1637620529880484

3. Surat Mengenai Thaipusam. Tidak dijawab.
Bahagian 1
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=1733146380327898&id=1637620529880484
Bahagian 2
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=1734609513514918&id=1637620529880484

4.Komen-komen saya dalam posting fb beliau tidak dipandang serius.

Beliau melarikan diri daripada bertanggungjawab kepada posting beliau. Beliau tidak mahu menjawab. Beliau pernah menegaskan bahawa ‘hak dia untuk tidak menjawab’. Kemudian mengeluarkan posting baharu dengan pembohongan seterusnya.

Jika saya buat perbandingan cara Firdaus, petik beberapa ayat dari kitab kamu, kemudian buat tafsiran sendiri, seterusnya meuar-uarkan kepada umum. Adakah anda setuju ?  Apabila diminta huraikan bukti, jawapan dia,

“Saudara ...., anda boleh teruskan untuk membuat surat terbuka menjawab artikel kami kerana itu hak anda. Ianya juga hak kami untuk tidak membalasnya & hak kami untuk terus menulis. “
Admin..  Firdaus Wong Wai Hung (Official)”

Kepada para Mukmin dan Mukminah, maafkan saya sekiranya saya ada terlepas kata yang menyinggung. Saya  tidak dapat menerima pernyataan yang salah mengenai agama saya. Sebarang fakta diutarakan perlu daripada sumber primer.  Kerana perkara yang menyentuh akidah, lebih -lebih lagi ia diutarakan oleh seorang yang bukan agama berkenaan.
Apakah tindakan saudara sekalian, sekiranya seorang bukan Islam mengeluarkan pernyataan sebegini terhadap agama anda?

Saya bukan anti Firdaus Wong.  Hanya saya tidak dapat terima sikap beliau yang lari daripada bertanggungjawab keatas post beliau terhadap agama Hindu.

Golongan pendidik, penceramah, pendakwah dll perlu ada sikap bertanggungjawab bagi setiap perkataan yang diutarakan dikalangan umum. Sikap bertanggungjawab ini dapat menjamin intergriti, kredibiliti dan digniti seseorang itu.

Setiap rakyat Malaysia perlu beringat pesanan Prof. Shamsul Amri, "perpaduan adalah kunci survival kejayaan negara" . Marilah kita sama - sama mengekalkan perpaduan.

Saya bersyukur kerana masih ada dikalangan mukmin yang memahami tujuan saya mempersoal Firdaus Wong. Misalnya, saudara Shahrir Baharuddin,  Hazman Rahman,  Zulkarnaen Sokarnor dll,  terima kasih kerana memahami mengapa saya mempersoalkan Firdaus Wong.

Kepada Saudara Firdaus Wong.

Saudara Firdaus perlu bertanggungjawab kepada segala fitnah keatas agama Hindu.

Saya menuntut supaya saudara,
1. Meminta maaf secara terbuka melalui posting fb.
2. Menarik balik semua posting mengenai agama Hindu.
3. Tidak membuat sebarang posting mengenai agama Hindu.

Kalau Saudara Firdaus Wong tidak bersalah,  maka saya menuntut supaya saudara Firdaus menjawab semua soalan -soalan saya mengenai agama Hindu seperti yang dinyatakan dalam posting saudara. Saya boleh sediakan siaran langsung secara tertutup. Keadaan ini akan memberi peluang untuk membuktikan kebenaran Saudara.

Kesimpulan.

Saudara berhak untuk berdakwah mengenai agama saudara, saya tiada masalah dalam hal ini.  Tetapi saudara tiada hak untuk menulis atau fitnah mengenai agama Hindu. Selagi saudara belum membuktikan kebenaran atau meminta maaf secara terbuka, perbuatan ini ialah FITNAH.

Perbuatan Firdaus Wong ini melibatkan semua Muslim, ianya perbuatan yang bertentangan dengan agama Islam sendiri.(Q. 6.108). Ia juga adalah perbuatan melanggar Perlembagaan Negara. Tindakan keras patut diambil terhadap Firdaus Wong dan organisasi MRM beliau.
Saya meminta rakyat Malaysia sama - sama bertanggungjawab demi menjaga keharmonian masyarakat.

Om Namah Shivaya

Sri Sivasiddhi
Sivasiddhi Spiritual Foundation
Malaysia

12 Februari 2018

S. K.
Malaysia Hindu Sangam.
Malaysia Hindudharma Mamandram.

(P/S.Saya menggunakan nama Pena untuk mengelakkan publisiti murahan atau menjadi juara.  Akan tampil diri jika keadaan memerlukannya)

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=1785892831719919&id=1637620529880484