Zakir made many muslim become shirk!

Zakir made many muslim become shirk! 

 Based on zakir 's method of manipulations and mistranslate the scriptures... I  can prove the name of Lord Shiva and Vishnu  in many surahs of quran. 
Just one example. In Quran, Allah is all pervading ....it is sarveshwar...one of the Shiva's thousand names.
Even in Quran.
1.  The prophet’s name only mentioned in 4 places than how do you expect his name appeared in other scriptures? It never appeared in any Hindu scriptures
2. Islam prohibits predictions,fortune telling.... and by believing it, it is shirk. The prophet’s name should not predicted earlier by anyone.  If you believe that, then it is SIN.  Poor Zakir made millions of muslims become shirk. Zakir made muslims fool.
3.  There is no single word mentioned about the prophet in any of Hindu scriptures. There is only one nearest sound like name in Bhavishya Puran....
4. By believing Muhammad as Kalki avatar of Lord Vishnu then one MUST believe all the other avatars of Vishnu. If so than Muhammad will be the avatar of God. This is the WORST SIN  according Islam. ASSOCIATING Muhammad WITH ALLAH ....ASSOCIATING VISHNU WITH ALLAH.   According Quran HELL is waiting for those who associates Allah.

Om Namasivaya. 
Sri  Sivasiddhi
Sivasiddhi Spiritual Foundation  Malaysia

Kepada Orang Yang Mempertuhankan Zakir

<script async src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script> <script> (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({ google_ad_client: "ca-pub-2960278825814307", enable_page_level_ads: true }); </script>

 Kepada Orang Yang Mempertuhankan Zakir.

 Wahai orang Muslim yang mempercayai kata -kata Zakir sebagai benar dan tidak menghina agama lain atau tidak bercanggah dengan agama Islam, maka kamu juga menerima metodologi/pendekatan Zakir memetik ayat -ayat daripada Kitab Hindu, kemudian membuat andaian dan tafsiran sendiri berdasarkan pemahaman sendiri. Seterusnya membuat kesimpulan yang memihak kepada agama Islam dengan menuduh penganut Hindu sebagai telah terpesong daripada ajaran sebenar.

Jika pendekatan Zakir dikira ilmiah apabila  saya mengunakan kaedah Zakir  dan membuat tafsiran sendiri yang juga patut dikira ilmiah.  Saya dapat menyimpulkan perkara- perkara berbangkit daripada kaedah Zakir yang perlu direnung oleh masyarakat Islam.

Zakir percaya dan yakin bahawa nama Nabi terakhir telah diramalkan dalam kitab-kitab Hindu. Ini secara langsung Zakir mempercayai dan mengesahkan kesahihan Kitab kitab Hindu telah diturunkan oleh Tuhan yang satu.

1.Masyarakat Islam yang berpegang teguh kepada Rukun Iman, iaitu beriman kepada al Quran dan Hadis sahaja. Tetapi kini masyarakat telah menerima Veda dll kitab, banyak yang menggunakan ayat- ayat daripada Veda. Bukankah mempercayai kitab kitab lain daripada ajaran Islam boleh menyimpangkan akidah orang muslim?

2. Amalan meramal masa depan adalah suatu perbuatan yang dikira syirik dalam Islam. Lebih lebih lagi mempercayai ramalan daripada kitab Hindu.  Jika ramalan adalah syirik, maka mempercayai ramalan juga syirik. Dengan mempercayai ramalan Zakir mengenai nama Nabi, bukankah perkara ini telah menyebabkan semua orang yang mempercayai Zakir juga turut berdosa kerana mempercayai ramalan?

3. Zakir amat yakin bahawa Nabi terakhir adalah orang yang sama yang disebut dalam kitab Hindu, dipercayai  Kalki avatar ( reinkarnasi Tuhan Vishnu) . Andaikan perkara ini benar ( pembohongan semata-mata,tiada sepatah perkataan yang menyebut nama Nabi), jika masyarakat Islam setuju dengan Zakir dan menerima Nabi adalah Kalki , maka wahai orang Muslim renunglah lebih mendalam.

Kalki avatar dipercayai adalah yang terakhir, tetapi ada kesemua 24 avatar yang berbeza sebelum ini. Jika pandangan Zakir dikira ilmiah, maka orang yang mempercayai Zakir harus juga mempercayai kesemua avatar Tuhan Vishnu yang lebih awal sebagai Nabi - Nabi Islam yang lebih awal. Jika ianya dikira ilmiah,maka orang yang mempercayai Zakir tiada pilihan lain melainkan menerimanya. Oleh hal yang demikian, orang Islam juga harus membuka minda lebih dalam  sedikit.

Dikalangan 24 avatar yang diambil oleh Vishnu, ada diantaranya bukan manusia ,contohnya Kurma ( penyu), Matsya(ikan) dan Varaha(babi). Persoalannya, adakah masyarakat Islam yang percaya Zakir menerima bahawa Nabi - Nabi Islam  itu mungkin juga terdiri daripada kalangan haiwan, lebih - lebih lagi babi? (Varaha avatar- Ada orang Hindu tidak makan babi kerana Tuhan Vishnu mengambil reinkarnasi ini.) Babi dikira haram dalam agama Islam. Adakah seorang Nabi Islam yang awal telah dilahirkan sebagai babi? Adakah pendekatan Zakir boleh diterima pakai orang Islam sendiri?

Siapakah yang telah terpesong? Tepuk dada tanya selera! Tafsiran Zakir mengenai kitab Hindu tidak jauh beza dengan Salman Rushdie. Kedua-duanya tafsir ikut kepala sendiri. Tafsiran yang salah, bohong,fitnah dan nista.

Om Namasivaya.

Sri  Sivasiddhi
Sivasiddhi Spiritual Foundation  Malaysia
31 May 2017

Rujukan
1. Kalki Purana.

Zakir’s modus operandi on religion conversion

Zakir’s modus operandi on religion conversion is simple.

His propaganda is ‘come into the common term’. He calls everyone look into what is common in religions and follow it.( His famous talk is about Similarity between Islam and Hinduism). He tries to prove Islam and Hinduism is same.

The problem is ,his analogy of common term is based to his own religion, Islam.  Whatever ideologies which are compromises Islam assumed/deemed as common term,neglecting all other religions fundamentals.Basic fundamental Islamic teaching is used as threshold. (This is against the ethics of Comparative Religions).

Basic teaching of Islam.

1. Islam believes one God which has no image,no children,no parents,etc. So Zakir picked whichever verses from Hindu Scriptures suites his belief. Among that the most widely used by Zakir is Yajur Veda 32.3 natasya pratima asti. (Chan.Up 6:2:1, Shv Up 6:9,Shv Up 4:19,Shv Up 4:20,...and many more) The idea of God has no image is not a contradiction to our religion because Brahman is also in formless form,etc. No issue here.
2. Islam prohibits idol worship. So Zakir picked the verses from Hindu Scriptures  which he THINKS that  prohibits idol worship. He widely used verse ( i ) Yajur Veda 40.9 in distorted version. Misconception of Zakir,he says Sambhuti as created things ( picture,idol,etc)and Asambhuti as  natural things (air,water,fire etc.) He hides the real meaning and other related verses ( YV 40.10-11).  Most controversial part which he tries to put Hinduism at wrong.  But YV 40.11 is clear evidence of Zakir’s ‘pseudo science’ bigotry attitude.YV40.9 actually says those who ONLY believes  God in formless form is in darkness and those ONLY believes God in form is in the further darkness. YV 40.11 says one who believes  BOTH ,God in form and formless is the real bhakta,will reach his abode.  ( ii ) BG. 7.20 - ‘those intelligence has been stolen by material desire desires surrender unto demigods’, again it is a misconception of Zakir with bad faith. The actual meaning is not related to prohibiting idol worship. There is nowhere written about prohibition of idol worship. Can Zakir ,which exact verse in any of Hindu Scriptures prohibits idol/murthy worship? We can see clearly the lies and slander of Zakir.
3. Prophet Muhammad is the final messenger of God. So Zakir try to prove that Prophet is the final messenger for all and claims that the name of Prophet had been predicted/mentioned in Hindu Scriptures. Example, (i) Zakir claims Kalki Avatar is the Prophet Muhammad based to Kalki Purana. (ii) A few selective words (either translated into Arabic in his own correct manipulated meaning or based to language phonetic) such as Narashangsa, Kaurama, Rebb,Ahamathi etc.from Vedas he picked to prove his claim that they are referring to  Prophet. ( iii) Changed the Bhavisya Purana story to suite his propaganda to prove his claim about Prophet. Bhavisya puran mentions about demoniac ghost of tripurasura (reincarnated) named Mahamada whom will bring adharmic  religion during kaliyuga.
4. Mecca is the  Kiblat (centre point) for Islam. So Zakir try to prove that it is mentioned in Hindu Scriptures in Kuntap Sukta,Atharvaveda
5. Islam believes in one life, no rebirth. So Zakir tries to prove that there is nothing written about rebirth or samsara in any Hindu Scriptures. There MANY verses in Hindu Scriptures.
6. Islam believes in one true God. So Zakir claims that other religions believes  False God. Example (i) Zakir questioned on Chaturti day of  Ganesha, to prove if Ganesha is a true God,if proved he will eat prasad of Ganesha temple. (ii) Zakir questioned how come Shiva cannot recognised His own son Ganesha, Zakir claimed Krishna married 16108  wives,etc. all were blasphemy against Hindu Gods.

7. etc.

Zakir used the above hypothesis and claims that Hindus were wronged by our pandits on Hindu Scriptures. The real teaching of Hinduism is in accordance with Islam as per Hindu Scriptures. He  is advising Hindus to convert to Islam.  Actually Zakir  manipulated,misquoted,mistranslated with his own understandings and imaginations  to confuse the Hindus,so that he can convert them into Islam. All the quotes and references were either  (i) quoted part of true verses or (ii)  taken out of context or  (iii) changed the words to suite his propaganda or (iv) mistranslated with his own correct words/meanings.

Lies and blasphemy of Zakir on Hinduism
Lie no.1. Zakir says "Vedas prohibits idol worship."  There is no word of prohibition. Ask Zakir to prove which exact verse says that? Which verses says God cannot /will not take form?.THERE IS NON
Lie no.2.  Zakir claims " rebirth never mentioned in Vedas." THERE ARE MANY verses from Hindu scriptures.
Lie no.3. Zakir claims his" Prophet's name was predicted in Hindu scripture" . This is another blatant lie.THERE IS NO SINGLE WORD mentioned in any scriptures ...by believing his theory of prediction he became syirik and made all the muslims who believe that also syirik!
Lie no.4.  Zakir claims his Prophet is the Kalki Avatar of Vishnu.This blasphemy against Vishnu the God. KALKI is avatar. Another total lie of Zakir.If his claim is true than he is accepting the other avatars of Vishnu and prophet as avatar or God. This is associating prophet/Kalki with God/Allah. The graves sin in Islam
Lie no.5  Zakir changed the entire story of Bhavisya purana . He made the Mahamada(demoniac ghost) as the saviour of mankind.
Lie no.6  Zakir said Krishna had 16108 wives. It is blasphemy against Krishna.

Lie no. 7  Zakir had insulted Hindu God Ganesha during celebrations and Shiva.

Zakir is liar,slanderer and blasphemer against Hinduism and God. So that Hindus demand a public apology from Zakir.

Om Namasivaya. 
Sri  Sivasiddhi

Sivasiddhi Spiritual Foundation  Malaysia

Warkah Terbuka.

Warkah terbuka kepada semua orang Islam. (Semua Mukmin and Mukminah)

Wahai orang Islam ,sedarkah kamu?

Zakir menghina  semua agama lain termasuk agama Hindu.
Asri menghina agama Hindu,
Hakikatnya mereka menghina Quran,(tidak menghayati kitab sendiri.
Zakir dan Asri menghina Islam  secara tidak sedar diri.

Kitab Islam
(Q.6.108- do not insult religion...,they will insult back..., they will return to their lord...)

Jika kamu orang Islam benar -benar ikhlas/beriman terhadap agama/Tuhan kamu, Kamu sekalian patut menasihati Zakir dan Asri supaya meminta maaf kepada umat Hindu  dan mendidik kedua-dua mereka supaya bertaubat dan meminta ampun daripada Tuhan kamu ( Tuhan yang Satu).

Menurut Islam,sesiapa yang berdosa, hukuman neraka menunggu, Mufti ,pendakwah,pemimpin mempunyai tanggungjawab yang lebih besar berbanding umat Islam biasa. Hukuman pun pasti lebih besar pada hari yang ditentukan itu!

Jahanam/ azab neraka sudah pasti menunggu!

Wahai orang Islam sedarlah dari lalai.

Orang Islam yang mempercayai Zakir akan ‘fakta’ (pembohongan) mengenai tafsiran dia berkaitan kitab - kitab Hindu.  Semuanya adalah pembohongan dan manipulasi ayat-ayat kitab Hindu di putar belit dalam mencapai propagandanya.

Soalan saya.

Adakah di antara kamu orang Islam telah menghayati  dan menilai kesahihan ‘ fakta- fakta’ Zakir daripada sumbernya yang asal? Menurut kitab kamu orang Islam, adalah berdosa untuk mempercayai sesuatu informasi tanpa usul periksa dengan sendiri.

Kitab Islam.

Q.17.36- do not accept info,unless you verify it...you are responsible (49.6).

Mempercayai sesuatu secara membuta tuli akan mengundang jahanam.(azab neraka).

Wahai orang Islam. Sedarlah kamu dari ketaksuban diri.

Jika Zakir benar -benar tidak bersalah , maka dia selamat daripada azab neraka. Jika Zakir bersalah, maka setiap seorang yang mempercayainya juga  akan bersalah, maka azab neraka akan menanti semua yang mempercayai Zakir.

Maka , adalah menjadi tanggungjawab kamu sendiri untuk menyiasat dan memastikan kesahihan informasi terutamanya melibatkan keimanan dan ketaqwaan supaya terselamat dari azab neraka.

Kitab Islam

Q.17.15-no one is carrying the burden of another…

Kamu bertanggungjawab untuk diri sendiri bagi menentukan jalan ke syurga. Di antara 73 mahzab, hanya satu sahaja benar, akan masuk syurga.(Tentukanlah diri kamu berada di pihak yang benar.)

Saya prihatin terhadap Zakir,Asri dan semua orang yang mempercayai Zakir. Kalaulah Zakir bersalah?

Hanya satu cara sahaja untuk  menyelesaikan kemelut ini. Zakir mesti bertanggungjawab bagi apa yang dimulakannya.

1. Buktikan semua pendakwaannya (claim) dan ‘fakta - fakta’ mengenai agama Hindu berdasarkan kitab asal Hindu, bukannya tafsiran sendiri.
2. Menjawab semua pertanyaan  berkaitan agama Hindu oleh orang Hindu sendiri secara terbuka (langsung) supaya semua dakwahan/ tohmahan dapat pencerahan.

Kalau ada sebuah Mahkamah Agama Universal. Saya ingin mendakwa Zakir atas tuduhan kesalahan menghina agama Hindu.

Biar Zakir membela diri. Kalau Zakir benar,saya rasa tiada isu menghina agama Hindu lagi. Dan kamu orang Islam akan berada di pihak yang benar.

Wahai orang Islam,  kekuatan Malaysia adalah dengan perpaduan masyarakat majmuknya. Marilah sama-sama  menyelesaikan kemelut yang melanda negara tercinta kita.

Harap tidak disalah tafsir sebagai campur tangan dalam agama Islam atau menghina Islam.

Sekian.

Penganut Agama Hindu.
Om Namasivaya. 
Sri  Sivasiddhi


Sivasiddhi Spiritual Foundation  Malaysia

Dilema Muslim

Dilema Muslim ?

Orang Muslim percaya Zakir Naik bercakap benar dan  tidak hina agama lain.

Beberapa persoalan berkaitan teori Zakir berkaitan agama Hindu.
Zakir amat yakin dan percaya (undoubtly) bahawa nama Nabi telah diramalkan dalam kitab kitab Hindu. Antaranya Zakir mendakwa bahawa Kalki avatar (Inkarnasi Tuhan Vishnu) itu ialah Nabi Muhammad, Zakir menyenaraikan banyak bukti berkaitannya.

Persoalan Pertama

1.Adakah saudara/i Muslim percaya  dakwaan Zakir ini benar. Ya atau Tidak

Orang Islam hanya patut percaya al Quran dan Hadis selaras dengan Rukun Iman dalam dilema kerana terpaksa mempercayai kitab Hindu kerana Zakir amat yakin dan percaya Nabi Muhammad adalah Kalki avatar ( inkarnasi Vishnu). Bukankah ini membawa kepada kesyirikan?

Bagi orang Islam yang mempertuhankan Zakir (maaf....definisi dr maza), Saudara/i boleh teliti video dlm youtube kalau tidak percaya,sila rujuk.https://youtu.be/AM9sT80M9pk

Zakir kata 'Kalki is undoubtedly is the prophet' dalam video itu.
(Adakah Zakir sudah jadi  syirik mempercayai kitab Hindu?)

Kita andaikan jawapan saudara/i sebagai Ya bagi persoalan pertama, kerana kalau jawapannya Tidak,maka Zakir akan menjadi penipu.

Teori Zakir mengatakan Kalki avatar ialah  Nabi Muhammad.( Zakir berkata Kalki adalah messenger selaras dengan Islam ,menolak cerita inkarnasi Vishnu.)

Jika teori ini diterima , maka orang yang mempertuhankan Zakir perlu juga mempercayai kesemua 23 avatar Tuhan Vishnu yang lain sebagai Nabi-Nabi Islam yang lebih awal.

Persoalan kedua

2.Adakah saudara/i Muslim akan mempercayainya kesemua 23 avatar Vishnu ialah Nabi-Nabi yang awal?.( Adakah Zakir mengetahui sepenuhnya kitab-kitab Hindu ? Adakah Zakir mendidik orang Islam ke arah jalan yang lurus?)

Orang Muslim terpaksa menerima dan mempercayai kesemua avatar Vishnu sebagai Nabi Nabi yang lebih awal. Adakah Zakir sedar atau menyedari ?  ,akan adanya beberapa avatar Vishnu berupa haiwan, contohnya Kurma avatar (penyu).Simha avatar (singa),..Varaha avatar (babi).dll .

Persoalan ketiga

3.Adakah orang Islam menerima akan Nabi awalnya pernah mengambil rupa atau menggunakan nama berkaitan babi?

Sedangkan Islam dan babi amat bercanggahan.

(Jikalau menolak teori ini, maka Zakir akan menjadi penipu.) Adakah Zakir menipu?

Persoalan keempat

4. Adakah orang Islam/Zakir mempercayai ramalan?

Ramal dan mempercayai ramalan adalah dosa dan syirik. Mempercayai nama Nabi telah diramalkan dalam kitab yang tidak berkaitan dengan Islam merupakan dosa besar. Ia adalah perbuatan melanggar rukun imam, iaitu beriman kepada al Quran dan Hadis sahaja.

Persoalan kelima

5. Adakah Zakir menyekutukan Allah dengan Tuhan Hindu?

Menyekutukan Allah dengan Vishnu adalah dosa yang paling laknat. Perbuatan menyamakan Nabi dengan Kalki ,bukankah adalah seperti menyamakan Allah dengan Vishnu? Zakir juga pernah menyamakan Tuhan Shiva sebagai Allah.

Persoalan keenam

6.Adakah Zakir menipu mengenai Kalki avatar?

Mengikut Kalki Purana,

a.Kalki ada 2 isteri.....Nabi ada banyak isteri.
b. Kalki ada  abang.... Nabi tiada abang.
c. Ibubapa Kalki hidup sampai usia tua.....Nabi yatim/ piatu.
d.Kalki ada anak lelaki….Nabi tiada anak lelaki.

e.Kalki dan 3 companion …...Nabi dan 4 Sahabat.

f. Dll…

Persoalan ketujuh.
Adakah Zakir menipu atau benar?

Saya percaya orang yang menipu/mengubah fakta agama  adalah sama dengan orang menghina  agama,( Q.6.108), dosa, azab neraka menunggu, bagaimana yang mempercayainya?

Persoalan  untuk Semua Muslim

Adakah di antara kamu orang Islam telah menghayati  dan menilai kesahihan ‘ fakta- fakta’ Zakir daripada sumbernya yang asal?

Menurut kitab kamu orang Islam, adalah berdosa untuk mempercayai sesuatu informasi tanpa usul periksa dengan sendiri.

Kitab Islam.

Q.17.36- jangan menerima sebarang info tanpa usul periksa sendiri...kamu bertanggungjawab... (49.6).

Mempercayai sesuatu secara membuta tuli akan mengundang jahanam.(azab neraka).

Wahai orang Islam. Sedarlah kamu dari ketaksuban diri.

Jika Zakir benar -benar tidak bersalah , maka dia akan selamat daripada azab neraka. Jika Zakir bersalah, maka setiap seorang yang mempercayainya juga  akan bersalah, maka azab neraka akan menanti semua yang mempercayai Zakir.

Maka , adalah menjadi tanggung jawab kamu sendiri untuk menyiasat dan memastikan kesahihan informasi terutamanya melibatkan keimanan dan ketakwaan supaya terselamat dari azab neraka.

Kitab Islam

Q.17.15- ...tiada orang yang menanggung beban orang lain...

Q.6.108- ...mereka (bukan Islam) akan kembali kepada Tuhan mereka, Tuhan mereka akan memberitahu akan perbuatan mereka….

Kamu bertanggung jawab untuk diri sendiri bagi menentukan jalan ke syurga. Di antara 73 mazhab, hanya satu sahaja benar, akan masuk syurga.(Tentukanlah diri kamu supaya berada di pihak yang benar.)

Saya prihatin terhadap Zakir, dan semua orang yang mempertuhankan Zakir. Kalaulah Zakir bersalah?

Om Namasivaya. 
Sri  Sivasiddhi

Sivasiddhi Spiritual Foundation  Malaysia

31 Mei 2017

Tell our children that Conversion is sin.

Tell our children that Conversion is sin.

<script async src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.
com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<script> (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({
 google_ad_client: "ca-pub-2960278825814307",
 enable_page_level_ads: true});

Currently I believe we must put aside our differences among Hindus of different teachings.Unite  together to  inform our youngsters about the sin of converting from the birth religion. This must be the utmost duty of every Hindus. Those convert out fall into category of Anarya / Parya (outcast)
According Hinduism, conversion is sin.
1.Converting from the religion of birth is sin because during the birth, the God made the choice. The God decided us to be born to a particular parent of particular faith. Since we cannot change our  parents so do the religion of birth. It is God's will. God knows who supposedly to follow which path.

2.’En matham Shanmatham ' not  'emmatham sammatham
Religion is just a path to reach out the supreme God.  There is One God, But if Hindus think any religion is fine,It is WRONG .This is the reason many converted without realizing /feeling guilty . We need to relook into it deeper.  It supposed to be ' en matham Shanmatham ' not  'emmatham sammatham',  our Hindus confused with this two phrases.  Shanmatham refers to the main 6 religion namely Saivam, Vainavam, Shaktham, Ganapathiyum, Kaumaram and Saumaram.  Other than these are not in Hinduism fold. People misunderstood with emmatham sammatham,  converting as they like.It is sin.

3. Rebirth is part of Hinduism’s core belief.   It is believed each atma will go through the Samsara of 84000 lives. Among these 14 (some says 7) lives the atma will be born as human. Among the human lifes, one can be born into any of faith/creed of family.  Remember all the religions are from the same God.  But for this particular birth, you are chosen to be born as a Hindu. Everyone of us are the CHOSEN. So, we are supposed to fulfill the duty of the   given birth. Changing religion  means, you are violating His choice. It is sin.
4. Hindu Shastras have mentioned  conversions is sin.
a) Vyasa says in Mahabharata Santi Parva,
'..The rejection of one's own creed, the practice of other people's creed, .....is wrong .’

b) Bhagavad gita there is a verse, which conveys that Devotee should attain salvation in  a path which he is born ( as taught by parents) and not change paths. Those who change path will neither be happy nor get salvation.  ( Not applicable to tender young children)

c) Vedas ,it has been told to teach everyone in Arya Dharma/Sanatan Dharma/dharmic law. It is a way of life. Distracting from the way of life will be disobeying Vedas.

5. Our sages had opposed conversions.

Adi Shankara had fought against conversion.  He debated with Buddhist monks to revert them back to Hinduism. Adi Shankara,  is one of the important enlightened soul saved Hinduism  from  Buddhism ,many of Hindus were converted during the time. In order to save Hinduism , he debated with them, the loser had to follow the winner's teaching orders.  I don't see this as conversion , it is a move to revert back to Hinduism.   If it was a conversion, then it must be some kind of forced conversion. The question of why Adi Shankara went in to such an approach,  The reason is to save Hinduism from extinction. I am sure, Enlighten soul such as Adi Shankara  realized that divine love is beyond religion but he stand up to revert back them.  At current situation, are we going to  let go the conversion without any  interference?,  Did we realized ,if we never take a firm action, it will lead to our Hindu religion into extinction ? Even Sri Chaitanya Mahaprabu,Tirumular and many other sages have against conversion out.

6.Read Bhavishya Purana, during Kaliyuga, adharmic religion will appear. Conversion is allowed in that adharmic religion, so that it can help to increase the Kali purusha’s (satan)  descendants.Be Aware.

Practicing (sadhana) a religion and converting into a religion are two different things.  Hinduism believes all the religions are from the only Brahman.  Any of the path is leads to Him alone.  So it is not wrong to practice. Any one of the other religions can practice Hinduism or any path they like. But converting, changing from the birth religion into a new religion because of certain benefits and DENYING the earlier religion is wrong.  So that conversion is sin.

Parents need to tell to their youngsters that conversion is sin. Our elders never told us about this, maybe be they were in comfort zone or not aware about its implications. 

Hindu temples or Organizations have to educated on conversion as sin. 
Hindu speakers should avoid speak positive about other religions and telling our religion followers more negative,  avoid using positive examples from other religions. This indirectly promoting conversion out. 
At current situation, Hindus are not afford to pretend naive anymore. Or you are paving the way for our own religion’s extinction .
Wake up now. Awake your Hindu friends now.

Om Namasivaya. 
Sri  Sivasiddhi

Sivasiddhi Spiritual Foundation  Malaysia

Muslims should accept all the avatar of Vishnu....Zakir?

Muslims should accept all the avatar of Vishnu....Zakir?

Regarding Zakir’s interference and transgression into Hinduism

Muslims in general believes Zakir is correct in his method of comparative religion . They believe Zakir never interfered/insulted Hinduism. Infact ,Zakir is insulting his own religion. Let see.

Zakir  claims, the  Prophet is the Kalki avatar. He gave many reasons for his claims. (His claims are flawed/wrong). If we assume his claim is true. And Muslims believe that as 100% true,then they must reconsider a few things.

If Muslims accept Zakir’s claims,(Kalki the last avatar is Muhammad the last prophet) then they must accept also all the other avatars of Vishnu too,which is about 24 of them. (Muslims believe that there were 124000 prophets were sent earlier by Allah). Muslims had to believe further that all the other avatars are also were the earlier prophets sent by Allah.

If so,Muslims must think deeper. How is it possible for certain avatar which are not in human form such as Kurma avtar ( turtle), Simha avatar ( lion) to be accepted as the earlier prophets. Are Muslims accepts these as the prophets of Islam.? Worst of all is the Varaha avtar ( pig), is pig can be a prophet of earlier?

This is one of the outcome of Zakir’s stupidity. Is it necessary for Zakir to interfere and transgress into other scriptures?

Zakir’s claims of his prophet was predicted/mentioned is the most stupid idea of a Muslim can think of.

If Zakir is correct,then these avatars should be accepted. And the Muslims must accept them as their prophet. Otherwise, ask Zakir to stick with his own scripture. Don't stray away from his book.

Om Namasivaya. 
Sri  Sivasiddhi


Sivasiddhi Spiritual Foundation  Malaysia