Warkah Terbuka.

Warkah terbuka kepada semua orang Islam. (Semua Mukmin and Mukminah)

Wahai orang Islam ,sedarkah kamu?

Zakir menghina  semua agama lain termasuk agama Hindu.
Asri menghina agama Hindu,
Hakikatnya mereka menghina Quran,(tidak menghayati kitab sendiri.
Zakir dan Asri menghina Islam  secara tidak sedar diri.

Kitab Islam
(Q.6.108- do not insult religion...,they will insult back..., they will return to their lord...)

Jika kamu orang Islam benar -benar ikhlas/beriman terhadap agama/Tuhan kamu, Kamu sekalian patut menasihati Zakir dan Asri supaya meminta maaf kepada umat Hindu  dan mendidik kedua-dua mereka supaya bertaubat dan meminta ampun daripada Tuhan kamu ( Tuhan yang Satu).

Menurut Islam,sesiapa yang berdosa, hukuman neraka menunggu, Mufti ,pendakwah,pemimpin mempunyai tanggungjawab yang lebih besar berbanding umat Islam biasa. Hukuman pun pasti lebih besar pada hari yang ditentukan itu!

Jahanam/ azab neraka sudah pasti menunggu!

Wahai orang Islam sedarlah dari lalai.

Orang Islam yang mempercayai Zakir akan ‘fakta’ (pembohongan) mengenai tafsiran dia berkaitan kitab - kitab Hindu.  Semuanya adalah pembohongan dan manipulasi ayat-ayat kitab Hindu di putar belit dalam mencapai propagandanya.

Soalan saya.

Adakah di antara kamu orang Islam telah menghayati  dan menilai kesahihan ‘ fakta- fakta’ Zakir daripada sumbernya yang asal? Menurut kitab kamu orang Islam, adalah berdosa untuk mempercayai sesuatu informasi tanpa usul periksa dengan sendiri.

Kitab Islam.

Q.17.36- do not accept info,unless you verify it...you are responsible (49.6).

Mempercayai sesuatu secara membuta tuli akan mengundang jahanam.(azab neraka).

Wahai orang Islam. Sedarlah kamu dari ketaksuban diri.

Jika Zakir benar -benar tidak bersalah , maka dia selamat daripada azab neraka. Jika Zakir bersalah, maka setiap seorang yang mempercayainya juga  akan bersalah, maka azab neraka akan menanti semua yang mempercayai Zakir.

Maka , adalah menjadi tanggungjawab kamu sendiri untuk menyiasat dan memastikan kesahihan informasi terutamanya melibatkan keimanan dan ketaqwaan supaya terselamat dari azab neraka.

Kitab Islam

Q.17.15-no one is carrying the burden of another…

Kamu bertanggungjawab untuk diri sendiri bagi menentukan jalan ke syurga. Di antara 73 mahzab, hanya satu sahaja benar, akan masuk syurga.(Tentukanlah diri kamu berada di pihak yang benar.)

Saya prihatin terhadap Zakir,Asri dan semua orang yang mempercayai Zakir. Kalaulah Zakir bersalah?

Hanya satu cara sahaja untuk  menyelesaikan kemelut ini. Zakir mesti bertanggungjawab bagi apa yang dimulakannya.

1. Buktikan semua pendakwaannya (claim) dan ‘fakta - fakta’ mengenai agama Hindu berdasarkan kitab asal Hindu, bukannya tafsiran sendiri.
2. Menjawab semua pertanyaan  berkaitan agama Hindu oleh orang Hindu sendiri secara terbuka (langsung) supaya semua dakwahan/ tohmahan dapat pencerahan.

Kalau ada sebuah Mahkamah Agama Universal. Saya ingin mendakwa Zakir atas tuduhan kesalahan menghina agama Hindu.

Biar Zakir membela diri. Kalau Zakir benar,saya rasa tiada isu menghina agama Hindu lagi. Dan kamu orang Islam akan berada di pihak yang benar.

Wahai orang Islam,  kekuatan Malaysia adalah dengan perpaduan masyarakat majmuknya. Marilah sama-sama  menyelesaikan kemelut yang melanda negara tercinta kita.

Harap tidak disalah tafsir sebagai campur tangan dalam agama Islam atau menghina Islam.

Sekian.

Penganut Agama Hindu.
Om Namasivaya. 
Sri  Sivasiddhi


Sivasiddhi Spiritual Foundation  Malaysia

Dilema Muslim

Dilema Muslim ?

Orang Muslim percaya Zakir Naik bercakap benar dan  tidak hina agama lain.

Beberapa persoalan berkaitan teori Zakir berkaitan agama Hindu.
Zakir amat yakin dan percaya (undoubtly) bahawa nama Nabi telah diramalkan dalam kitab kitab Hindu. Antaranya Zakir mendakwa bahawa Kalki avatar (Inkarnasi Tuhan Vishnu) itu ialah Nabi Muhammad, Zakir menyenaraikan banyak bukti berkaitannya.

Persoalan Pertama

1.Adakah saudara/i Muslim percaya  dakwaan Zakir ini benar. Ya atau Tidak

Orang Islam hanya patut percaya al Quran dan Hadis selaras dengan Rukun Iman dalam dilema kerana terpaksa mempercayai kitab Hindu kerana Zakir amat yakin dan percaya Nabi Muhammad adalah Kalki avatar ( inkarnasi Vishnu). Bukankah ini membawa kepada kesyirikan?

Bagi orang Islam yang mempertuhankan Zakir (maaf....definisi dr maza), Saudara/i boleh teliti video dlm youtube kalau tidak percaya,sila rujuk.https://youtu.be/AM9sT80M9pk

Zakir kata 'Kalki is undoubtedly is the prophet' dalam video itu.
(Adakah Zakir sudah jadi  syirik mempercayai kitab Hindu?)

Kita andaikan jawapan saudara/i sebagai Ya bagi persoalan pertama, kerana kalau jawapannya Tidak,maka Zakir akan menjadi penipu.

Teori Zakir mengatakan Kalki avatar ialah  Nabi Muhammad.( Zakir berkata Kalki adalah messenger selaras dengan Islam ,menolak cerita inkarnasi Vishnu.)

Jika teori ini diterima , maka orang yang mempertuhankan Zakir perlu juga mempercayai kesemua 23 avatar Tuhan Vishnu yang lain sebagai Nabi-Nabi Islam yang lebih awal.

Persoalan kedua

2.Adakah saudara/i Muslim akan mempercayainya kesemua 23 avatar Vishnu ialah Nabi-Nabi yang awal?.( Adakah Zakir mengetahui sepenuhnya kitab-kitab Hindu ? Adakah Zakir mendidik orang Islam ke arah jalan yang lurus?)

Orang Muslim terpaksa menerima dan mempercayai kesemua avatar Vishnu sebagai Nabi Nabi yang lebih awal. Adakah Zakir sedar atau menyedari ?  ,akan adanya beberapa avatar Vishnu berupa haiwan, contohnya Kurma avatar (penyu).Simha avatar (singa),..Varaha avatar (babi).dll .

Persoalan ketiga

3.Adakah orang Islam menerima akan Nabi awalnya pernah mengambil rupa atau menggunakan nama berkaitan babi?

Sedangkan Islam dan babi amat bercanggahan.

(Jikalau menolak teori ini, maka Zakir akan menjadi penipu.) Adakah Zakir menipu?

Persoalan keempat

4. Adakah orang Islam/Zakir mempercayai ramalan?

Ramal dan mempercayai ramalan adalah dosa dan syirik. Mempercayai nama Nabi telah diramalkan dalam kitab yang tidak berkaitan dengan Islam merupakan dosa besar. Ia adalah perbuatan melanggar rukun imam, iaitu beriman kepada al Quran dan Hadis sahaja.

Persoalan kelima

5. Adakah Zakir menyekutukan Allah dengan Tuhan Hindu?

Menyekutukan Allah dengan Vishnu adalah dosa yang paling laknat. Perbuatan menyamakan Nabi dengan Kalki ,bukankah adalah seperti menyamakan Allah dengan Vishnu? Zakir juga pernah menyamakan Tuhan Shiva sebagai Allah.

Persoalan keenam

6.Adakah Zakir menipu mengenai Kalki avatar?

Mengikut Kalki Purana,

a.Kalki ada 2 isteri.....Nabi ada banyak isteri.
b. Kalki ada  abang.... Nabi tiada abang.
c. Ibubapa Kalki hidup sampai usia tua.....Nabi yatim/ piatu.
d.Kalki ada anak lelaki….Nabi tiada anak lelaki.

e.Kalki dan 3 companion …...Nabi dan 4 Sahabat.

f. Dll…

Persoalan ketujuh.
Adakah Zakir menipu atau benar?

Saya percaya orang yang menipu/mengubah fakta agama  adalah sama dengan orang menghina  agama,( Q.6.108), dosa, azab neraka menunggu, bagaimana yang mempercayainya?

Persoalan  untuk Semua Muslim

Adakah di antara kamu orang Islam telah menghayati  dan menilai kesahihan ‘ fakta- fakta’ Zakir daripada sumbernya yang asal?

Menurut kitab kamu orang Islam, adalah berdosa untuk mempercayai sesuatu informasi tanpa usul periksa dengan sendiri.

Kitab Islam.

Q.17.36- jangan menerima sebarang info tanpa usul periksa sendiri...kamu bertanggungjawab... (49.6).

Mempercayai sesuatu secara membuta tuli akan mengundang jahanam.(azab neraka).

Wahai orang Islam. Sedarlah kamu dari ketaksuban diri.

Jika Zakir benar -benar tidak bersalah , maka dia akan selamat daripada azab neraka. Jika Zakir bersalah, maka setiap seorang yang mempercayainya juga  akan bersalah, maka azab neraka akan menanti semua yang mempercayai Zakir.

Maka , adalah menjadi tanggung jawab kamu sendiri untuk menyiasat dan memastikan kesahihan informasi terutamanya melibatkan keimanan dan ketakwaan supaya terselamat dari azab neraka.

Kitab Islam

Q.17.15- ...tiada orang yang menanggung beban orang lain...

Q.6.108- ...mereka (bukan Islam) akan kembali kepada Tuhan mereka, Tuhan mereka akan memberitahu akan perbuatan mereka….

Kamu bertanggung jawab untuk diri sendiri bagi menentukan jalan ke syurga. Di antara 73 mazhab, hanya satu sahaja benar, akan masuk syurga.(Tentukanlah diri kamu supaya berada di pihak yang benar.)

Saya prihatin terhadap Zakir, dan semua orang yang mempertuhankan Zakir. Kalaulah Zakir bersalah?

Om Namasivaya. 
Sri  Sivasiddhi

Sivasiddhi Spiritual Foundation  Malaysia

31 Mei 2017

Tell our children that Conversion is sin.

Tell our children that Conversion is sin.

<script async src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.
com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<script> (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({
 google_ad_client: "ca-pub-2960278825814307",
 enable_page_level_ads: true});

Currently I believe we must put aside our differences among Hindus of different teachings.Unite  together to  inform our youngsters about the sin of converting from the birth religion. This must be the utmost duty of every Hindus. Those convert out fall into category of Anarya / Parya (outcast)
According Hinduism, conversion is sin.
1.Converting from the religion of birth is sin because during the birth, the God made the choice. The God decided us to be born to a particular parent of particular faith. Since we cannot change our  parents so do the religion of birth. It is God's will. God knows who supposedly to follow which path.

2.’En matham Shanmatham ' not  'emmatham sammatham
Religion is just a path to reach out the supreme God.  There is One God, But if Hindus think any religion is fine,It is WRONG .This is the reason many converted without realizing /feeling guilty . We need to relook into it deeper.  It supposed to be ' en matham Shanmatham ' not  'emmatham sammatham',  our Hindus confused with this two phrases.  Shanmatham refers to the main 6 religion namely Saivam, Vainavam, Shaktham, Ganapathiyum, Kaumaram and Saumaram.  Other than these are not in Hinduism fold. People misunderstood with emmatham sammatham,  converting as they like.It is sin.

3. Rebirth is part of Hinduism’s core belief.   It is believed each atma will go through the Samsara of 84000 lives. Among these 14 (some says 7) lives the atma will be born as human. Among the human lifes, one can be born into any of faith/creed of family.  Remember all the religions are from the same God.  But for this particular birth, you are chosen to be born as a Hindu. Everyone of us are the CHOSEN. So, we are supposed to fulfill the duty of the   given birth. Changing religion  means, you are violating His choice. It is sin.
4. Hindu Shastras have mentioned  conversions is sin.
a) Vyasa says in Mahabharata Santi Parva,
'..The rejection of one's own creed, the practice of other people's creed, .....is wrong .’

b) Bhagavad gita there is a verse, which conveys that Devotee should attain salvation in  a path which he is born ( as taught by parents) and not change paths. Those who change path will neither be happy nor get salvation.  ( Not applicable to tender young children)

c) Vedas ,it has been told to teach everyone in Arya Dharma/Sanatan Dharma/dharmic law. It is a way of life. Distracting from the way of life will be disobeying Vedas.

5. Our sages had opposed conversions.

Adi Shankara had fought against conversion.  He debated with Buddhist monks to revert them back to Hinduism. Adi Shankara,  is one of the important enlightened soul saved Hinduism  from  Buddhism ,many of Hindus were converted during the time. In order to save Hinduism , he debated with them, the loser had to follow the winner's teaching orders.  I don't see this as conversion , it is a move to revert back to Hinduism.   If it was a conversion, then it must be some kind of forced conversion. The question of why Adi Shankara went in to such an approach,  The reason is to save Hinduism from extinction. I am sure, Enlighten soul such as Adi Shankara  realized that divine love is beyond religion but he stand up to revert back them.  At current situation, are we going to  let go the conversion without any  interference?,  Did we realized ,if we never take a firm action, it will lead to our Hindu religion into extinction ? Even Sri Chaitanya Mahaprabu,Tirumular and many other sages have against conversion out.

6.Read Bhavishya Purana, during Kaliyuga, adharmic religion will appear. Conversion is allowed in that adharmic religion, so that it can help to increase the Kali purusha’s (satan)  descendants.Be Aware.

Practicing (sadhana) a religion and converting into a religion are two different things.  Hinduism believes all the religions are from the only Brahman.  Any of the path is leads to Him alone.  So it is not wrong to practice. Any one of the other religions can practice Hinduism or any path they like. But converting, changing from the birth religion into a new religion because of certain benefits and DENYING the earlier religion is wrong.  So that conversion is sin.

Parents need to tell to their youngsters that conversion is sin. Our elders never told us about this, maybe be they were in comfort zone or not aware about its implications. 

Hindu temples or Organizations have to educated on conversion as sin. 
Hindu speakers should avoid speak positive about other religions and telling our religion followers more negative,  avoid using positive examples from other religions. This indirectly promoting conversion out. 
At current situation, Hindus are not afford to pretend naive anymore. Or you are paving the way for our own religion’s extinction .
Wake up now. Awake your Hindu friends now.

Om Namasivaya. 
Sri  Sivasiddhi

Sivasiddhi Spiritual Foundation  Malaysia

Muslims should accept all the avatar of Vishnu....Zakir?

Muslims should accept all the avatar of Vishnu....Zakir?

Regarding Zakir’s interference and transgression into Hinduism

Muslims in general believes Zakir is correct in his method of comparative religion . They believe Zakir never interfered/insulted Hinduism. Infact ,Zakir is insulting his own religion. Let see.

Zakir  claims, the  Prophet is the Kalki avatar. He gave many reasons for his claims. (His claims are flawed/wrong). If we assume his claim is true. And Muslims believe that as 100% true,then they must reconsider a few things.

If Muslims accept Zakir’s claims,(Kalki the last avatar is Muhammad the last prophet) then they must accept also all the other avatars of Vishnu too,which is about 24 of them. (Muslims believe that there were 124000 prophets were sent earlier by Allah). Muslims had to believe further that all the other avatars are also were the earlier prophets sent by Allah.

If so,Muslims must think deeper. How is it possible for certain avatar which are not in human form such as Kurma avtar ( turtle), Simha avatar ( lion) to be accepted as the earlier prophets. Are Muslims accepts these as the prophets of Islam.? Worst of all is the Varaha avtar ( pig), is pig can be a prophet of earlier?

This is one of the outcome of Zakir’s stupidity. Is it necessary for Zakir to interfere and transgress into other scriptures?

Zakir’s claims of his prophet was predicted/mentioned is the most stupid idea of a Muslim can think of.

If Zakir is correct,then these avatars should be accepted. And the Muslims must accept them as their prophet. Otherwise, ask Zakir to stick with his own scripture. Don't stray away from his book.

Om Namasivaya. 
Sri  Sivasiddhi


Sivasiddhi Spiritual Foundation  Malaysia

Muslims should pray Hindu Gods...Zakir?

Muslims should pray Hindu Gods...Zakir?

Zakir’s interference and transgression into Hinduism.

Muslims in general believes Zakir is correct in his method of comparative religion . They believe Zakir never interfered/insulted Hinduism.  Infact ,Zakir is insulting his own religion. Let see.

Zakir used to claim, the name of the Prophet have been predicted in Hindu scriptures. One of zakir’s famous argument is the term of ‘narashangsa’  translated  into ‘praiseworthy’, which according Zakir is referring to Prophet of Islam. So wherever the word narashangsa appears in Hindu scriptures, Zakir claims it is his prophet was predicted/mentioned. He further advises Hindus do not need to wait for Kalki avatar because his Prophet is the avatar. So that ,Hindus must follow Islam.

If we use the same method of Zakir to claim his, Hindus can claim there are hundreds of Hindu Gods names written in their scripture. For example the words

1. Sustainer (rabb) is Vishnu.

2. Creator (khaliq) is Brahma

3. All pervading is Sarvaeswar, Shiva.

4.and many other words

So can Hindus claim, Quran is referring to Hindu Gods? If so, can we advise to  all Muslims, that they must pray Brahma,Vishnu and Shiva?

Allah has 99 names, Shiva has 1000 names. All the 99 names of Allah can be absorbed into 1000 names of Shiva. So can Hindus called the Muslims to pray Hindu Gods?

If Zakir is correct,then this analogy should be accepted. Otherwise, ask Zakir to stick with his own scripture. Don't stray away from his book.

Om Namasivaya. 
Sri  Sivasiddhi


Sivasiddhi Spiritual Foundation  Malaysia

Answers for Those Hindus Rejecting the idea of 'Conversion is sin '

Answers for Those Hindus Rejecting the idea of 'Conversion is sin '
When I forwarded the view ‘Conversion is sin ‘ in public, I received negative comments  or rejection from Hindus and non Hindus as well. I just ignore non Hindu views because they propagate the same. If Hindus start to propagate the same, they can't convert anymore.

Among Hindus we  are divided in three groups. Spiritualist ( anmigavathy), religious ( mathavathy) and small cultus like ritualist  ( sirupanmai valipaduvar).Most religious groups supports and so called spiritualist against it without look into current situations. We can forgo the cultus. The group which are against it, I salute them in a way for their stand . They are more into spiritualism as God is beyond religion.

Some of reasons or questions identified;

1.  If we agree conversion is sin,  then we are putting down other religions outside Shanmatham,  and it will against the princeps of sanatan dharma.
2. Telling  conversion is sin, is  a negative approach which we don't apply in sanatan dharma.
3. They claim there is no Hindu scriptures/shastra mentioned that conversion is sin /wrong.
4. No credible (apta) gurus have mentioned conversion is wrong.
5. Adi Shankara himself had converted Buddhist back in to Hinduism after they lost in debate with him.
6. Siva Purana have mentioned Narada had 'converted'.....in tripurasura episode
So that  conversion is not sin,according to them.

7.  If Conversion is sin, how about those whom are from other religion at birth now following Hinduism?


Hindus don't agree, let's see the reason 1,
'If we agree conversion is sin,  then we are putting down other religions outside Shanmatham,  and it against the princep of sanatan dharma. '

I don't see how other religions outside Shanmatham were put down.  In fact if we study the main abrahamic religions,they are strongly advocates that conversion is sin, of course in their own belief system. They believe, Who ever go against  God is a sinner. Whoever converts out from their religion is considered apostasy ,is sin. If so, if we in Hinduism emulate the same view as they were, this emulation is supporting their dogmatic believe. We come together into a common term with them. Besides, Hinduism advocates all the religions are from the only God.

Hindus don't agree, let's see the reason 2,
‘ It is  a negative approach  which we don't apply in sanatan dharm.'

Is it really a negative approach?  If telling conversion is sin to our vulnerable youngsters is a definite negative approach,  than the religion outside of Shanmatham falls into negativity itself, because they strongly advocates that. By thinking this approach is negative than we really put them in the negativity. Isn't it?
Just forget about that,  even in our scripture Ramayana have indicated that sometimes a 'negative' approach is needed /used in order to eliminate the 'negativity',  it will be in dharmic fold. (mule mulalethan edeke mudiyum). For example, in case of Rama killing Vali. Bali had to be killed without face him directly. Who ever face direct against Vali,will lost their strength ( boon to Vali). So, Rama had to attack hidden.

Hindus don't agree, let's see the reason 3,
‘There is no Hindu scriptures (shastra) mentioned that conversion is sin /wrong’.

There was   about 12400 different types of writing once available and what ever scriptures available as at today, there is no where have mentioned  that conversion is sin. As far as my knowledge.And at the same time there is nowhere had written that conversion is not sin. Even in such a huge volume of scriptures  (ocean / university), Hinduism never have a single book to be accepted as the authority of reference as in abrahamic religion(Bible). We believe Vedas are divine revelations(sruthi) yet Vedas is just as guide to refer, if one never read vedas ,will not be considered  sin as in other religions outside Shanmatham claims. Hinduism doesn't rely on any scriptures because there is no single book was dropped from heaven or God's pocket. Swami Vivekananda have mentioned it as dry bones of religion, do not obsessed to the scriptures /books. The truth is in you. The truth can be grasped/tap from the divine source in the form of sruthi (divine revelation).

There were mentioned in Shastras.Hindu Shastras have mentioned  conversions is sin.
a) Vyasa says in Mahabharata Santi Parva,
'..The rejection of one's own creed, the practice of other people's creed, .....is wrong .’
b) Bhagavad gita there is a verse, which conveys that Devotee should attain salvation in  a path which he is born ( as taught by parents) and not change paths. Those who change path will neither be happy nor get salvation.  ( Not applicable to your children)
c) Vedas ,it has been told to teach everyone in Arya Dharma/Sanatan Dharma/dharmic law. It is a way of life. Distracting from the way of life will be disobeying .
d) Garuda Purana mentioned it is sin if not followed the religion. It is mentioned in chapter 4.9,if one despise places of pilgrimage, good men, good actions, teachers, shining ones is sin. If we disparages the Puranas,Vedas,Mimamsa,Nyaya,Vedanta also sin. In chapter 4.11,  not listen to words of Shastra in sin. In chapter 4.36, if one engages in self indulgence, do not worship Shiva Hari,Surya Ganesh is sin. In chapter 5.7, if we despises Vedas, Shastras can becomes jaundiced in next birth. By converting, one will disobey all of this.

Even today. So in my opinion, why not we  reconsider conversion is sin in order to protect our youngsters /Hindus in general from to be converted.

Hindus don't agree, let's see the reason 4,
‘No credible /apta gurus have mentioned it as wrong’.

Apta gurus refer to those who learned Vedas,.gurus, sages .. Acarya sampradaya, whom are considered important references on religion matter. But there is no single acarya sampradaya,Sabha or etc.  was given the authorization to represent all. So how to rely on those available. We don't have Adi Shankara, Madhvacharya, Swami Vivekananda etc. to defend Hinduism right now.
For those really not happy with this opinion, I suggest you people go around to the many ashram around you and ask yourself to the gurus available. Most of them not happy with current situation on conversion and says it is sin.  But they don't speak in public because one need to explain the reason for the advocacy.
One example of Guru fought the conversion issue is Adi Shankara himself.  If he accepts conversion, than why he need to debate and 'convert' the Buddhist back?
Do  we realized ,if we never take a firm action, it will lead to our Hindu religion into extinction ? Even Sri Chaitanya Mahaprabu,Tirumular and many other sages have against conversion out.

Hindus don't agree, let's see reason 5,
'Adi Shankara himself had converted Buddhist back to Hinduism after they lost in debate with him. '

Adi Shankara,  is one of the important enlightened soul saved Hinduism  from Buddhism ,many of Hindus were converted during the time. In order to save Hinduism , he debated with them, the loser had to follow the winner's teaching orders.  I don't see this as conversion , it is a move to revert back to Hinduism. If it was a conversion, then it must be some kind of forced conversion. The question of why Adi Shankara went in to such an approach,  The reason is to save Hinduism from extinction. I am sure, Enlighten soul such as Adi Shankara realized that divine love is beyond religion but he stand up to revert back them. At current situation, are we going to  let go the conversion without any interference?, Did we realized ,if we never take a firm action, it will lead to our Hindu religion into extinction ? Wake up.

Hindus don't agree, let's see
Reason 6,
‘Siva Purana have mentioned Narada had 'converted'.....in tripurasura episode ‘

As we knew Narada always singing the glory of Narayanan ( Maha Vishnu).
Tripurasuras need to be deceived in order to eliminate them.  It is the plan of Vishnu . Lord Shiva only will eliminate asuras if they go into adharmic . So the ‘conversion ‘ is planned (Lila) in the process of elimination of adharma. It won't be able to be counted as conversion.

Hindus don't agree, let's see the reason 7,

If Conversion is sin, how about those whom are from other religion at birth now following Hinduism such in  Hare Hare Krishna, Sai Baba,etc., many Europeans, Christians, Chinese etc.? Are they are sinners too?

This is the question, most challenging to answer. Most of our Hindu brothers doubts the notion.But it can be justify.

We must see two things here.The meaning and purpose of conversion and sadhana.Practicing (sadhana) a religion and converting into a religion are two different things.  

Hinduism believes all the religions are from the only Brahman.  Any of the path is leads to Him alone. So it is not wrong to practice or pray in any marga. Everyone is correct at their atmic level, because atman is Brahman. Every religions are belongs to the only God.

SADHANA is  spiritual rituals or practices one applying. Any one from  other religions practice Hinduism or any path they like WITHOUT REJECTING other path of reaching God. By not rejecting other path of Brahman,  they won't fall in the category of sin.

But CONVERTING, changing from the birth religion into a new religion because of certain benefits and DENYING the earlier religion is wrong.  By denying the other path of brahman, you are denying the teaching of sanathana dharma.So that conversion is sin.

Om  Namasivaya.

Sri Sivasiddhi
Sivasiddhi Spiritual Foundation
Malaysia

Kafirism, Infidels and Anarya

Kafirism, Infidels, and Anarya

Labeling people based on their own religious beliefs should be avoided. But some so-called religion labeled people rampantly. Blind bigotry egoistic and ignorant's belief.

Among Abrahamic.
The conception of non Abrahamic by the Abrahamic followers as nonbelievers based on their scriptures and understanding is the most inappropriate thing. Anyway, it is their perceptions.

Kafir (Arabic term) means a person who is denying the existence of God. As in Hinduism, they were called nastika, in Christianity, they were called atheist, and so on. All the religion's fundamental core belief is based on God. Since there is only ONE GOD, non-Muslims are not kafir.  Some fanatic bigots mistranslated their scripture to manipulate their political status-quo by claiming that only if called the God in certain particular name and prayer method is the true God.

Any Muslims can verify from your scripture about the term. It is its own interpretation based to own scripture. It is ok if kept the term within, not say it out. If one labels another based own beliefs, then the others will do the same.
If you address me a kafir, then I will address you as Anarya / Mlecha as mentioned in my scriptures. It is not good for a multiracial society.

God-Centered Belief
All the religions' core belief is God. There is no one prays in the name of Satan.

Hindus say there is God, that is Brahman...
Christians say there is God, that is God...
Muslims say the is NO God, but Allah.
An Atheist says there is NO God...
SO WHO  ARE THE REAL BELIEVER? All are believing something.

Some information about kafir.... extract from Mujahidin Zulkifli
In a typical Islamic country under Islamic administration, the non-Muslims are divided into a few categories:

1) Kafir harbi fi'lan: These are non-Muslims that are physically hostile (waging war) against Islamic countries.

It's a requirement for Muslims to kill them (as announced by Pahang Mufti recently). Killing kafir harbi fi'lan will not result in any punishment for the Muslim killer.

2) Kafir harbi hukman: These are non-Muslims that do not have any privilege of protection in an Islamic country and they are not waging war against an Islamic country.

Killing kafir harbi hukman doesn't bring death punishment to a Muslim but only half of a diyya (compensation to the family). This was backed by a Hadith, where Abu Juhaifa reported: "The Prophet, peace, and blessings be upon him, judged that a believer should not be killed for killing a disbeliever." Sahih Bukhari 6517 in the context of kafir harbi hukman.

3) Kafir muahid and dzimmi: They are non-Muslims who have a protection agreement with an Islamic administration. Muahids are not citizens of the Islamic country but have peace agreements. Dzimmis are citizens and pay jizyahs (a form of tax or protection money).

It is haram to kill these types of non-Muslims. Many Hadiths protecting them. Also backed by Quran 9:29 "Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued."

Among Hindus
The word anarya or mleccha is equivalent to kafir or infidel. We Hindus don't label anyone base on our own beliefs. While parya is a fall out from arya/Hindu

The Real Meaning of Parya * (Modern era)
1. A person who eats beef knowingly,  because eating beef is prohibited and is against the

Hindu tenets.
2. A Hindu converted out from Hinduism because of rejection on Hinduism ( not believing Brahman / God, Hindu scriptures, Rituals, etc.)
3. A person born Hindu but never practiced Hinduism because never believe the Supreme Brahman.
4. Those of descendants of a converted out from Hinduism

Anyone can fall into the category of parya if violated any of the above conditions.

If you are a Hindu, then you cannot be a pariah.  If you're a pariah then you cannot be a Hindu.
The word pariah derived from parya. The word parya is partly synonym to anarya. Anarya means non-Hindu. Arya means Hindu. It doesn't referring the 'parai' drum player community in Tamil Nadu, India. They were Hindus but doing the work of funeral/ cremation

As per Siva Purana, the cow is a divine animal.  Sivaperuman's favorite animal.  His favorite pasu/cow named Susila kept Brindavanam under the care of Govardhan. Thus, eating beef will bring wrath. Fall into category of parya.
Hindus as spiritualists (anmigavathy) no one will accept the term to differentiate the human race. (Vasudewa kurumbakam)
But as a religion perceptor (mathavathy),  this term has its meaning and it will ride away from the other religion's atrocity on Hindus.

We were labeled by non-Hindus as such kaffirs or infidels without understanding the consequences on us.  It is time to teach back.
My thousand apologies if it hurts someone.
If others label us as kafirs or infidels then I feel the term parya will put everyone into a common term. Now, it is time to throwing back the misconception where it belongs. Hindus don't judge people as everyone are the children of Brahman. But, we were forced to come into the common terms of Kafir by Islam and Infidel by Christianity.

Om Namasivaya.

Sivasiddhi
Sivasiddhi Spiritual Foundation  Malaysia

Updated 4 March 2019

Reference
1.https://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2019/03/01/nu-calls-for-end-to-word-infidels-to-describe-non-muslims.html

2.https://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/bahasa/2019/03/06/mufti-perak-pahang-anggap-tak-salah-rujuk-bukan-islam-sebagai-kafir/